Re: [PATCH v1 01/11] media: dt-bindings: starfive,jh7110-camss: add binding document
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Mar 03 2023 - 03:35:45 EST
On 02/03/2023 10:19, jack.zhu wrote:
> Add DT binding document for Starfive Camera subsystem driver
>
> Signed-off-by: jack.zhu <jack.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/media/starfive,jh7110-camss.yaml | 150 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 150 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/starfive,jh7110-camss.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/starfive,jh7110-camss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/starfive,jh7110-camss.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9a34944ca0ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/starfive,jh7110-camss.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/starfive,jh7110-camss.yaml#"
> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
Drop quotes from both.
> +
> +title: Starfive SoC CAMSS ISP
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + - Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
No need for '|'
> + The Starfive CAMSS ISP is a Camera interface for Starfive JH7110 SoC.It
> + consists of a VIN controller(Video In Controller, a top-level control until)
> + and a ISP.
"an ISP", I think
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: starfive,jh7110-camss
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 2
Drop minItems, no need.
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: syscon
> + - const: isp
> +
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 7
Drop mintems
> + maxItems: 7
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: clk_apb_func
> + - const: clk_wrapper_clk_c
> + - const: clk_dvp_inv
> + - const: clk_axiwr
> + - const: clk_mipi_rx0_pxl
> + - const: clk_ispcore_2x
> + - const: clk_isp_axi
Drop "clk" prefix
> +
> + resets:
> + minItems: 6
Drop
> + maxItems: 6
> +
> + reset-names:
> + items:
> + - const: rst_wrapper_p
Drop rst prefix
> + - const: rst_wrapper_c
> + - const: rst_axird
> + - const: rst_axiwr
> + - const: rst_isp_top_n
> + - const: rst_isp_top_axi
> +
> + power-domains:
> + items:
> + - description: JH7110 PD ISP - ISP Power Domain Switch Controller.
Drop redundant pieces, e.g. "PD ISP"
> +
> + interrupts:
> + minItems: 4
Drop
> + maxItems: 4
> +
> + ports:
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> +
> + properties:
> + port@1:
And what about port@0?
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + description:
> + Input port for receiving CSI data.
> +
> + properties:
> + endpoint@1:
Hm, do you have more than one endpoint in this port? Why unit address?
> + $ref: video-interfaces.yaml#
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> + required:
> + - port@1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reg-names
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> + - resets
> + - reset-names
> + - power-domains
> + - interrupts
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> +
Drop blank line
> + stfcamss: camss@19840000 {
isp@
> + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-camss";
> + reg = <0x19840000 0x10000>,
> + <0x19870000 0x30000>;
All this looks misaligned
> + reg-names = "syscon", "isp";
> + clocks = <&ispcrg 0>,
> + <&ispcrg 13>,
Looks even worse...
> + <&ispcrg 2>,
> + <&ispcrg 12>,
> + <&ispcrg 1>,
> + <&syscrg 51>,
> + <&syscrg 52>;
> + clock-names = "clk_apb_func",
> + "clk_wrapper_clk_c",
> + "clk_dvp_inv",
> + "clk_axiwr",
> + "clk_mipi_rx0_pxl",
> + "clk_ispcore_2x",
> + "clk_isp_axi";
> + resets = <&ispcrg 0>,
> + <&ispcrg 1>,
> + <&ispcrg 10>,
> + <&ispcrg 11>,
> + <&syscrg 41>,
> + <&syscrg 42>;
> + reset-names = "rst_wrapper_p",
> + "rst_wrapper_c",
> + "rst_axird",
> + "rst_axiwr",
> + "rst_isp_top_n",
> + "rst_isp_top_axi";
> + power-domains = <&pwrc 5>;
> + interrupts = <92>, <87>, <88>, <90>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + vin_from_csi2rx: endpoint@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&csi2rx_to_vin>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
Best regards,
Krzysztof