Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for AST2600-i2cv2

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03/03/2023 09:55, Ryan Chen wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 	
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 4:51 PM
>> To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wolfram Sang
>> <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>; Brendan Higgins
>> <brendan.higgins@xxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>;
>> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rob
>> Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> openbmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for AST2600-i2cv2
>>
>> On 03/03/2023 09:28, Ryan Chen wrote:
>>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 4:20 PM
>>>> To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wolfram Sang
>>>> <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>; Brendan Higgins
>>>> <brendan.higgins@xxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Jeffery
>>>> <andrew@xxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Philipp Zabel
>>>> <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Benjamin
>>>> Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>>>> linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; openbmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>> linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for
>>>> AST2600-i2cv2
>>>>
>>>> On 01/03/2023 06:57, Ryan Chen wrote:
>>>>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 4:25 PM
>>>>>> To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Jeffery
>>>>>> <andrew@xxxxxxxx>; Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@xxxxxxxxx>;
>>>>>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Joel Stanley
>>>>>> <joel@xxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof
>>>>>> Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Philipp Zabel
>>>>>> <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>>>> openbmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>>>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>>>> linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for
>>>>>> AST2600-i2cv2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 26/02/2023 04:13, Ryan Chen wrote:
>>>>>>> Add ast2600-i2cv2 compatible and aspeed,global-regs,
>>>>>>> aspeed,timeout aspeed,xfer-mode description for ast2600-i2cv2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml   | 44
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml
>>>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml
>>>>>>> index f597f73ccd87..75de3ce41cf5 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml
>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/aspeed,i2c.yaml
>>>>>>> @@ -49,6 +49,25 @@ properties:
>>>>>>>      description:
>>>>>>>        states that there is another master active on this bus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +  aspeed,timeout:
>>>>>>> +    type: boolean
>>>>>>> +    description: I2C bus timeout enable for master/slave mode
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing improved here in regards to my last comment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, as I know your require is about " DT binding to represent
>>>>> hardware
>>>> setup"
>>>>> So I add more description about aspeed,timeout as blow.
>>>>>
>>>>> ASPEED SOC chip is server product, i2c bus may have fingerprint
>>>>> connect to
>>>> another board. And also support hotplug.
>>>>> The following is board-specific design example.
>>>>> Board A                                         Board B
>>>>> -------------------------                       ------------------------
>>>>> |i2c bus#1(master/slave)  <===fingerprint ===> i2c bus#x (master/slave)|
>>>>> |i2c bus#2(master)-> tmp i2c device |          |
>>>> |
>>>>> |i2c bus#3(master)-> adc i2c device |          |
>>>> |
>>>>> -------------------------                       ------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> aspeed,timout properites:
>>>>> For example I2C controller as slave mode, and suddenly disconnected.
>>>>> Slave state machine will keep waiting for master clock in for rx/tx
>> transmit.
>>>>> So it need timeout setting to enable timeout unlock controller state.
>>>>> And in another side. In Master side also need avoid suddenly slave
>>>> miss(un-plug), Master will timeout and release the SDA/SCL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you mean add those description into ore aspeed,timout properites
>>>> description?
>>>>
>>>> You are describing here one particular feature you want to enable in
>>>> the driver which looks non-scalable and more difficult to configure/use.
>>>> What I was looking for is to describe the actual configuration you have (e.g.
>>>> multi-master) which leads to enable or disable such feature in your
>> hardware.
>>>> Especially that bool value does not scale later to actual timeout
>>>> values in time (ms)...
>>>>
>>>> I don't know I2C that much, but I wonder - why this should be
>>>> specific to Aspeed I2C and no other I2C controllers implement it?
>>>> IOW, this looks quite generic and every I2C controller should have
>>>> it. Adding it specific to Aspeed suggests that either we miss a
>>>> generic property or this should not be in DT at all (because no one else has
>> it...).
>>>>
>>>> Also I wonder, why you wouldn't enable timeout always...
>>>>
>>>> +Cc Wolfram,
>>>> Maybe you know whether bool "timeout" property for one controller
>>>> makes sense? Why we do not have it for all controllers?
>>>>
>>> Because, i2c bus didn’t specific timeout.
>>> But SMBus defines a clock low time-out, TIMEOUT of 35 ms.
>>>
>>> It have definition in SMBus specification.
>>> http://smbus.org/specs/SMBus_3_1_20180319.pdf
>>> You can check Page 18, Note3 that have timeout description.
>>
>> Then you have already property for this - "smbus"?
> To be a property "smbus", that would be a big topic, 
> I saw fsl i2c also have this.
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml#L43-L47
> So, I just think the "timeout" property.

Yeah and this is the only place. It also differs because it allows
actual timeout values.

Best regards,
Krzysztof