Re: [RFC PATCH] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Don't call __qcom_icc_set twice on the same node
From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Fri Mar 03 2023 - 06:34:03 EST
On 3.03.2023 12:32, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 03/03/2023 02:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Currently, when sync_state calls set(n, n) all the paths for setting
>> parameters on an icc node are called twice. Avoid that.
>>
>> Fixes: 751f4d14cdb4 ("interconnect: icc-rpm: Set destination bandwidth as well as source bandwidth")
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> RFC comes from the fact that I *believe* this should be correct, but I'm
>> not entirely sure about it..
>>
>>
>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>> index a6e0de03f46b..d35db1af9b08 100644
>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
>> ret = __qcom_icc_set(src, src_qn, sum_bw);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> - if (dst_qn) {
>> + if (dst_qn && src_qn != dst_qn) {
>> ret = __qcom_icc_set(dst, dst_qn, sum_bw);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>
> Is it possible for src_qn == dst_qn ?
As the commit message says, sync_state calls set(n, n) in
drivers/interconnect/core.c : icc_sync_state(struct device *dev)
Konrad
>
> Iff you confirm that experimentally - add my
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>