Re: [PATCH v3 11/34] ia64: Implement the new page table range API

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:37:14PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> >  void arch_dma_mark_clean(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long pfn = PHYS_PFN(paddr);
> > +	struct folio *folio = page_folio(phys_to_page(paddr));
> > +	ssize_t left = size;
> > +	size_t offset = offset_in_folio(folio, paddr);
> 
> Build of defconfig failed miserably for me without this:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> index 12aef25944aa..0775e7870257 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ __ia64_sync_icache_dcache (pte_t pte)
>   */
>  void arch_dma_mark_clean(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size)
>  {
> -	struct folio *folio = page_folio(phys_to_page(paddr));
> +	unsigned long pfn = __phys_to_pfn(paddr);
> +	struct folio *folio = page_folio(pfn_to_page(pfn));

Huh, TIL that only some architectures have phys_to_page().  Thanks.
I'm going to use PHYS_PFN instead of __phys_to_pfn just to reduce the
diff.