Re: [PATCH 5.15] usb: dwc3: dwc3-qcom: Add missing platform_device_put() in dwc3_qcom_acpi_register_core

[Zheng Yejian]

On 2023/3/6 13:49, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:26:31AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> > On 2023/3/3 23:49, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 10:34:39AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> > > > From: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > commit fa0ef93868a6062babe1144df2807a8b1d4924d2 upstream.
> > > >
> > > > Add the missing platform_device_put() before return from
> > > > dwc3_qcom_acpi_register_core in the error handling case.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211231113641.31474-1-linmq006@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > CVE: CVE-2023-22995
> > >
> > > That is a bogus CVE, please go revoke it.
> >
> > Agree. I see this CVE and its fixes information from NVD,
> > so try to backport this patch to fix it:
> > Link: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22995
>
> Again, this is not a valid bug, the "problem" described can not ever be
> hit in a real system from what I can tell.

Agreed!

> > Then should I just remove the "CVE: " field and send a v2 patch?
> > Or you mean "revoke" the CVE from NVD? I actually don't know how
> > to do that :(
>
> If you care about CVEs being "real", yes, please get it revoked from the
> NVD.  There is no need to backport it either from what I can determine.

Thanks for you pationce :)

--
Zheng Yejian

> thanks,
>
> greg k-h