Re: [PATCH v2 07/18] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers
From: James Morse
Date: Mon Mar 06 2023 - 06:32:48 EST
Hi Reinette,
On 02/02/2023 23:47, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> On 1/13/2023 9:54 AM, James Morse wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -567,19 +579,14 @@ static int __rdtgroup_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk,
>> * For monitor groups, can move the tasks only from
>> * their parent CTRL group.
>> */
>> -
>> - if (rdtgrp->type == RDTCTRL_GROUP) {
>> - WRITE_ONCE(tsk->closid, rdtgrp->closid);
>> - WRITE_ONCE(tsk->rmid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>> - } else if (rdtgrp->type == RDTMON_GROUP) {
>> - if (rdtgrp->mon.parent->closid == tsk->closid) {
>> - WRITE_ONCE(tsk->rmid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>> - } else {
>> - rdt_last_cmd_puts("Can't move task to different control group\n");
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> + if (rdtgrp->type == RDTMON_GROUP &&
>> + !resctrl_arch_match_closid(tsk, rdtgrp->mon.parent->closid)) {
>> + rdt_last_cmd_puts("Can't move task to different control group\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + resctrl_arch_set_closid_rmid(tsk, rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>
> This does not use the intended closid when rdtgrp->type == RDTMON_GROUP.
Yes, it should be rdtgrp->mon.parent->closid.
rdtgroup_mkdir_mon() initialises them to be the same, I guess its Peter's monitor-group
rename that means this could get the wrong value?
I've fixed it as:
---------%<---------
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index c7392d10dc5b..30d8961b833c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -585,7 +585,12 @@ static int __rdtgroup_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk,
return -EINVAL;
}
- resctrl_arch_set_closid_rmid(tsk, rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
+ if (rdtgrp->type == RDTMON_GROUP)
+ resctrl_arch_set_closid_rmid(tsk, rdtgrp->mon.parent->closid,
+ rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
+ else
+ resctrl_arch_set_closid_rmid(tsk, rdtgrp->closid,
+ rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
/*
* Ensure the task's closid and rmid are written before determining if
---------%<---------
Thanks,
James