Re: [PATCH] docs/sp_SP: Add process deprecated translation

[Carlos Bilbao]

On 3/6/23 09:30, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On 2023/03/07 0:20, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> > Hello Akira,
> >
> > On 3/6/23 09:13, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > Minor nits in the Subject and Sob area.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:44:20 -0600, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] docs/sp_SP: Add process deprecated translation
> > >
> > > This summary looks ambiguous to me.
> > >
> > > Maybe
> > >
> > >      docs/sp_SP: Add translation of process/deprecated
> >
> > This summary follows the same format followed in the past. Some examples:
> >
> > docs/sp_SP: Add process coding-style translation
> > docs/sp_SP: Add process magic-number translation
> > docs/sp_SP: Add process programming-language translation
> > docs/sp_SP: Add process email-clients translation
>
> Let me explain why "Add process deprecated translation" looks
> ambiguous.
>
> "deprecated translation" can be interpreted as "some translation
> which is deprecated".
> Of course you don't need to agree.

I see what you mean. I'm sending v2 patch renamed to avoid confusion.

> > > ??
> > >
> > > > Translate Documentation/process/deprecated.rst into Spanish.
> > > >
> > > > Co-developed-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez <sergio.collado@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > To me, Co-developed-by: from the author of the patch looks
> > > strange, because it is obvious the author did some development on
> > > the patch.
> >
> > No, we both worked on this patch so Co-developed-by: is the appropriate
> > tagging. That being said, Sergio translated more than I did, so I put
> > him as sole Translator in the document itself.
>
> Hmm, anyway I don't think you are following the rule of Co-developed-by:
> explained in submitting-patches.rst.
>
> Again, you don't need to agree... ;-)

But, why doesn't it follow the rule?

The rule is "A Co-Developed-by: states that the patch was also created by 
another developer along with the original author. This is useful at times 
when multiple people work on a single patch."

IMHO this is the case here, but before I send v2 I'll wait to read you 
again in case we agree at that point.

>          Thanks, Akira
>
> > > Which is your intent:
> > >
> > >      Author: Carlos
> > >      Co-developer: Sergio
> > >
> > > , or
> > >
> > >      Author: Sergio
> > >      Co-developer: Carlos
> > >
> > > ???
> > >
> > >           Thanks, Akira
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >    .../translations/sp_SP/process/deprecated.rst | 381 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >    .../translations/sp_SP/process/index.rst      |   1 +
> > > >    2 files changed, 382 insertions(+)
> > > >    create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/deprecated.rst
> > > [...]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carlos

Thanks,
Carlos