Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Square apq8039-t2 board

[Stephan Gerhold]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:36:54PM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> The apq8039-t2 is an apq8039 based board paired with a wcn3680b WiFi
> chipset.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Benjamin Li <benl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Li <benl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: James Willcox <jwillcox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: James Willcox <jwillcox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Joseph Gates <jgates@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Gates <jgates@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Max Chen <mchen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Max Chen <mchen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Zac Crosby <zac@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zac Crosby <zac@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile       |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts | 550 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 551 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> index 31aa54f0428c3..2983e83a19061 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= apq8016-sbc.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= apq8039-t2.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= apq8094-sony-xperia-kitakami-karin_windy.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= apq8096-db820c.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= apq8096-ifc6640.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..6ff044bfe2ebc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,550 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2015, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2023, Linaro Ltd.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "msm8939.dtsi"
> +#include "msm8939-pm8916.dtsi"
> +#include <dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/sound/apq8016-lpass.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +	model = "Square, Inc. T2 Devkit";
> +	compatible = "square,apq8039-t2", "qcom,msm8939";
> +
> +	qcom,board-id = <0x53 0x54>;
> +	qcom,msm-id = <QCOM_ID_MSM8939 0>, <QCOM_ID_MSM8939 0x30000>, <QCOM_ID_APQ8039 0x30000>;

Does the board have variants with MSM8939 v2, MSM8939 v3.0 and APQ8039
v3.0? If not it should be enough to list only a single item (the actual
SoC in use).

> [...]
> +&blsp1_uart1 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&blsp1_uart1_default>;
> +	pinctrl-1 = <&blsp1_uart1_sleep>;
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&blsp1_uart2 {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&blsp1_uart2_default>;
> +	pinctrl-1 = <&blsp1_uart2_sleep>;

This is in msm8939.dtsi already.

> [...]
> +&pronto {
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&wcnss_pin_a>;

This is also in msm8939.dtsi already.

> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	iris {
> +		compatible = "qcom,wcn3680";
> +	};
> +};
> +
> [...]
> +	blsp1_uart1_default: blsp1-uart1-default-state {
> +		pins = "gpio0", "gpio1";
> +		function = "blsp_uart1";
> +		drive-strength = <16>;
> +		bias-disable;
> +	};
> +
> +	blsp1_uart1_sleep: blsp1-uart1-sleep-state {
> +		pins = "gpio0", "gpio1";
> +		function = "gpio";
> +		drive-strength = <2>;
> +		bias-pull-down;
> +	};

Personally I'd override just the pins of the definition in msm8939.dtsi
since everything else is exactly the same. Not a strict change request
though, I guess this is subjective:

&blsp1_uart1_default {
	pins = "gpio0", "gpio1";
};

&blsp1_uart1_sleep {
	pins = "gpio0", "gpio1";
};

> +
> +	ext_buck_vsel_reg: ext-buck-vsel-reg-state {
> +		function = "gpio";
> +		pins = "gpio111";
> +		drive-strength = <2>;
> +	};

This seems unused.

> [...]
> +	sq_spe_enable: sq-spe-enable-state {
> +		pins = "gpio35";
> +		function = "gpio";
> +		output-low;
> +	};

This seems unused as well.

> +
> +	tlmm_crq_reg: tlmm-crq-reg-state {
> +		function = "gpio";
> +		pins = "gpio12";
> +		output-high;
> +	};
> +
> +	tlmm_spe_reg: tlmm-spe-reg-state {
> +		pins = "gpio108";
> +		function = "gpio";
> +		output-high;
> +	};
> +

Does output-high really make sense here? These are assigned to a
regulator-fixed. The driver for fixed regulators initializes the
GPIO state based on the "regulator-boot-on" property. If the property
exists it does gpiod_get(... GPIOD_OUT_HIGH), otherwise GPIOD_OUT_LOW.

You don't have regulator-boot-on. So I would expect the GPIO/regulator
state to toggle unnecessarily during initialization:

  - First pinctrl is applied so the GPIO is set to output-high.
    The regulator gets turned on for a few ms/ns.
  - Then the driver probes which initializes it to GPIOD_OUT_LOW.
    The regulator turns back off.

I'd just drop the output-high here and leave it up to the regulator
driver to initialize the GPIO state. If you want the regulator on during
boot, use regulator-boot-on.

Thanks,
Stephan