Re: [PATCH 13/13] rcu/kvfree: Eliminate k[v]free_rcu() single argument macro

From: Uladzislau Rezki
Date: Mon Mar 06 2023 - 11:46:04 EST


On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 03:12:03PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 07:01:08AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> [..]
> > > > 7. We then evaluate whether further cleanups are needed.
> > > >
> > > > > > My feeling is
> > > > > > that, we introduced "_mightsleep" macros first and after that try to
> > > > > > convert users.
> > > >
> > > > > One stopgap could be to add a checkpatch error if anyone tries to use old API,
> > > > > and then in the meanwhile convert all users.
> > > > > Though, that requires people listening to checkpatch complaints.
> > > >
> > > > Every person who listens is that much less hassle. It doesn't have to
> > > > be perfect. ;-)
> > >
> > > The below checkpatch change can catch at least simple single-arg uses (i.e.
> > > not having compound expressions inside of k[v]free_rcu() args). I will submit
> > > a proper patch to it which we can include in this set.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > ---
> > > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 +++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > index 78cc595b98ce..fc73786064b3 100755
> > > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > @@ -6362,6 +6362,15 @@ sub process {
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +# check for soon-to-be-deprecated single-argument k[v]free_rcu() API
> > > + if ($line =~ /\bk[v]?free_rcu\s*\([^(]+\)/) {
> > > + if ($line =~ /\bk[v]?free_rcu\s*\([^,]+\)/) {
> > > + ERROR("DEPRECATED_API",
> > > + "Single-argument k[v]free_rcu() API is deprecated, please pass an rcu_head object." . $herecurr);
> >
> > Nice!
> >
> > But could you please also tell them what to use instead? Sure, they
> > could look it up, but if it tells them directly, they are less likely
> > to ignore it.
>
> Sounds good, I will modify the warning to include the API to call and send
> out a patch soon.
>
Maybe compile warnings? Or is it too aggressive?

Thanks!

--
Uladzislau Rezki