Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add SM6125 compatible string

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 6.03.2023 18:01, Lux Aliaga wrote:
> 
> On 06/03/2023 13:52, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>> Document the compatible for UFS found on the SM6125.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> index b517d76215e3..42422f3471b3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ properties:
>>             - qcom,sc8280xp-ufshc
>>             - qcom,sdm845-ufshc
>>             - qcom,sm6115-ufshc
>> +          - qcom,sm6125-ufshc
>>             - qcom,sm6350-ufshc
>>             - qcom,sm8150-ufshc
>>             - qcom,sm8250-ufshc
>> @@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ allOf:
>>             contains:
>>               enum:
>>                 - qcom,sm6115-ufshc
>> +              - qcom,sm6125-ufshc
>>       then:
>>         properties:
>>           clocks:
> I have to apologize. I worked on a changelog for this patchset but I skipped the subject header, therefore it didn't send, and as I realized this I interrupted the process, leaving the patchset incomplete. I'll retry sending it, this time correctly.
Happens, next time resend it with a RESEND prefix, e.g. [RESEND PATCH 1/2]

Konrad
>