Re: [PATCH] docs/sp_SP: Add process deprecated translation

[Carlos Bilbao]

On 3/6/23 17:03, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:34:29 -0600, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> > On 3/6/23 09:30, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > > On 2023/03/07 0:20, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> > > > Hello Akira,
> > > >
> > > > On 3/6/23 09:13, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > Minor nits in the Subject and Sob area.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:44:20 -0600, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] docs/sp_SP: Add process deprecated translation
> > > > >
> > > > > This summary looks ambiguous to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe
> > > > >
> > > > >       docs/sp_SP: Add translation of process/deprecated
> > > >
> > > > This summary follows the same format followed in the past. Some examples:
> > > >
> > > > docs/sp_SP: Add process coding-style translation
> > > > docs/sp_SP: Add process magic-number translation
> > > > docs/sp_SP: Add process programming-language translation
> > > > docs/sp_SP: Add process email-clients translation
> > >
> > > Let me explain why "Add process deprecated translation" looks
> > > ambiguous.
> > >
> > > "deprecated translation" can be interpreted as "some translation
> > > which is deprecated".
> > > Of course you don't need to agree.
> >
> > I see what you mean. I'm sending v2 patch renamed to avoid confusion.
> >
> > > > > ??
> > > > >
> > > > > > Translate Documentation/process/deprecated.rst into Spanish.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Co-developed-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez <sergio.collado@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@xxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > To me, Co-developed-by: from the author of the patch looks
> > > > > strange, because it is obvious the author did some development on
> > > > > the patch.
> > > >
> > > > No, we both worked on this patch so Co-developed-by: is the appropriate
> > > > tagging. That being said, Sergio translated more than I did, so I put
> > > > him as sole Translator in the document itself.
> > >
> > > Hmm, anyway I don't think you are following the rule of Co-developed-by:
> > > explained in submitting-patches.rst.
> > >
> > > Again, you don't need to agree... ;-)
> >
> > But, why doesn't it follow the rule?
> >
> > The rule is "A Co-Developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer along with the original author. This is useful at times when multiple people work on a single patch."
> >
> > IMHO this is the case here, but before I send v2 I'll wait to read you again in case we agree at that point.
>
> If you put "From: Sergio" as the first line in the Changelog, like
> this submission [1], then the Sob chain would make sense.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20230227222957.24501-2-rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> Didn't you forgot to put it there?

Sending v2 :)

> Just guessing...
>
>          Thanks, Akira
>
> > >           Thanks, Akira
> > >
> > > > > Which is your intent:
> > > > >
> > > > >       Author: Carlos
> > > > >       Co-developer: Sergio
> > > > >
> > > > > , or
> > > > >
> > > > >       Author: Sergio
> > > > >       Co-developer: Carlos
> > > > >
> > > > > ???
> > > > >
> > > > >            Thanks, Akira
> > > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >     .../translations/sp_SP/process/deprecated.rst | 381 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >     .../translations/sp_SP/process/index.rst      |   1 +
> > > > > >     2 files changed, 382 insertions(+)
> > > > > >     create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/deprecated.rst
> > > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Carlos
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carlos

Thanks,
Carlos