On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 10:54:28AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
Use devm version of gpiochip add function to handle removal for us.
I do not see this change in the below code.
Can you shed a light?
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c
index c1bb2c3ca6f2..23f58bf3a415 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c
@@ -492,18 +492,6 @@ static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *of_gpio_twl4030(struct device *dev,
return omap_twl_info;
}
-/* Cannot use as gpio_twl4030_probe() calls us */
-static int gpio_twl4030_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct gpio_twl4030_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-
- gpiochip_remove(&priv->gpio_chip);
-
- /* REVISIT no support yet for deregistering all the IRQs */
- WARN_ON(!is_module());
- return 0;
-}
-
static int gpio_twl4030_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
@@ -581,12 +569,9 @@ static int gpio_twl4030_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
priv->gpio_chip.ngpio = 0;
- gpio_twl4030_remove(pdev);
goto out;
}
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
-
if (pdata->setup) {
int status;
@@ -615,7 +600,6 @@ static struct platform_driver gpio_twl4030_driver = {
.of_match_table = twl_gpio_match,
},
.probe = gpio_twl4030_probe,
- .remove = gpio_twl4030_remove,
};
static int __init gpio_twl4030_init(void)