Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: dma: snps,dw-axi-dmac: constrain resets items for JH7110 dma
From: Walker Chen
Date: Tue Mar 07 2023 - 20:08:52 EST
On 2023/3/7 23:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/03/2023 11:30, Walker Chen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/3/7 17:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2023 15:04, Walker Chen wrote:
>>>> The DMA controller needs two reset items to work properly on JH7110 SoC,
>>>> so there is need to constrain the items' value to 2, other platforms
>>>> have 1 reset item at most.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Walker Chen <walker.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml | 24 +++++++++++++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml
>>>> index ad107a4d3b33..d8b5439f215c 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml
>>>> @@ -12,14 +12,12 @@ maintainers:
>>>> description:
>>>> Synopsys DesignWare AXI DMA Controller DT Binding
>>>>
>>>> -allOf:
>>>> - - $ref: "dma-controller.yaml#"
>>>> -
>>>> properties:
>>>> compatible:
>>>> enum:
>>>> - snps,axi-dma-1.01a
>>>> - intel,kmb-axi-dma
>>>> + - starfive,jh7110-axi-dma
>>>>
>>>> reg:
>>>> minItems: 1
>>>> @@ -58,7 +56,8 @@ properties:
>>>> maximum: 8
>>>>
>>>> resets:
>>>> - maxItems: 1
>>>> + minItems: 1
>>>> + maxItems: 2
>>>>
>>>> snps,dma-masters:
>>>> description: |
>>>> @@ -109,6 +108,23 @@ required:
>>>> - snps,priority
>>>> - snps,block-size
>>>>
>>>> +allOf:
>>>> + - $ref: "dma-controller.yaml#"
>>>
>>> Rebase your patches on something recent... I would argue that it should
>>> be based on maintainer's (or linux-next) tree, but that would be too
>>> good to be true.
>>
>> This was written by referring to the syntax of other dt-binding, but your suggestion
>> is a good one, the next version of patches will be rebased on kernel 6.3.
>
> Rebasing on old kernel was referring to syntax of other binding? I don't
> understand this. How old code which you copied is related anyhow to
> other binding? You are expected to send patches always based on recent
> one, not something old.
Okay, I understand what you mean.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> + - if:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + contains:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> + - starfive,jh7110-axi-dma
>>>> + then:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + resets:
>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>
>>> What are the items expected here?
>>
>> Do you mean to add descriptions for items here ?
>
> Yes, because order of the items is fixed.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Walker