Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm: compaction: Limit the value of interface compact_memory

From: Luis Chamberlain
Date: Wed Mar 08 2023 - 17:23:26 EST


On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:54:31PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 3/8/23 20:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> > {
> >> > - if (write)
> >> > + int ret;
> >> > +
> >> > + ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
> >> > + if (ret)
> >> > + return ret;
> >> > + if (write) {
> >> > + pr_info("compact_nodes start\n");
> >> > compact_nodes();
> >> > + pr_info("compact_nodes end\n");
> >>
> >> I'm not sure we want to start spamming the dmesg. This would make sense
> >> if we wanted to deprecate the sysctl and start hunting for remaining
> >> callers to be fixed. Otherwise ftrace can be used to capture e.g. the time.
> >
> > Without that print, I don't think a custom proc handler is needed too,
> > right? So what would simplify the code.
>
> But we'd still call compact_nodes(), so that's not possible without a custom
> handler, no?

Ah right. It does beg the question if that form is common, so to define one.
But that's just extra work not needed now.

Luis