Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] meida: uvcvideo: reimplement privacy gpio as a separate subdevice
From: Ricardo Ribalda
Date: Wed Mar 08 2023 - 17:57:22 EST
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 06:46, Yunke Cao <yunkec@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 5:26 PM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yunke
> >
> > Thank you very much for the patchset :)
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 09:52, Yunke Cao <yunkec@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > privacy_gpio in uvc were added as V4L2_CID_PRIVACY in uvc video node in
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20201223133528.55014-1-ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Userspace applications often require to constantly poll privacy control.
> > > Currently, polling privacy control requires keeping the video node open,
> > > which prevents the camera from autosuspending.
> > >
> > > This patchset adds a separate v4l2 subdevice. Userspace access the gpio
> > > via V4L2_CID_PRIVACY in the new subdevice. Applications can poll the
> > > privacy control status without opening the video node and activate the
> > > camera.
> > >
> > > The non-gpio V4L2_CID_PRIVACY in uvc is not affected.
> >
> > Since this is a RFC, lets focus on the idea and not on the code itself.
> >
> > - I am missing a reference to the subdevice from the media device. How
> > will a user figure out that /dev/v4l-subdev0 is the privacy gpio of
> > /dev/media0 and not /dev/media1?. Thake a look to the "ancillary
> > links"
> > - We have already exposed the control as part of the main video
> > device, that means that we need to keep that API. The control on
> > /dev/v4l-subdev0 should "mirror" the control on /dev/video0
> > - There is no need to v4l2_ctrl_fill_event(), if you modify the
> > control with a set controll function, the media controller should take
> > care of everything
>
> Thanks! I will fix these in the next version if we decide to proceed.
>
> >
> > @Sakari Ailus @Hans Verkuil : Assuming a correct implementation, how
> > would you feel about exposing a privacy gpio as a subdevice?
> >
>
> Sakari, Hans, do you think this idea makes sense?
Friendly ping
>
> Best,
> Yunke
>
> >
> > Thanks!!!
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunke Cao <yunkec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Yunke Cao (3):
> > > media: v4l2-ctrls: Expose v4l2_ctrl_fill_event()
> > > media: uvcvideo: remove entity privacy control in the uvc video node
> > > media: uvcvideo: reimplement privacy GPIO as a separate subdevice
> > >
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c | 17 -------
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 44 ++----------------
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 19 +++++---
> > > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls-core.c | 9 ++--
> > > include/media/v4l2-ctrls.h | 12 +++++
> > > 6 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> > > ---
> > > base-commit: 7dd4b804e08041ff56c88bdd8da742d14b17ed25
> > > change-id: 20230111-uvc_privacy_subdev-1e7a167e86eb
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > --
> > > Yunke Cao <yunkec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ricardo Ribalda
--
Ricardo Ribalda