Re: [PATCH 2/4] nvmem: core: allow nvmem_cell_post_process_t callbacks to adjust buffer
From: Miquel Raynal
Date: Thu Mar 09 2023 - 06:26:17 EST
Hi Srinivas,
srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:53:07 +0000:
> On 09/03/2023 10:32, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Srinivas,
> >
> > srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:12:24 +0000:
> >
> >> On 22/02/2023 17:22, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >>> @@ -1791,11 +1792,15 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> >>> if (!nvmem)
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> > + /* Cells with read_post_process hook may realloc buffer we can't allow here */
> >>> + if (info->read_post_process)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >> This should probably go in 1/4 patch. Other than that series looks good to me.
> >
> > FYI patch 1/4 is also carried by the nvmem-layouts series, so it's
> > probably best to keep these 2 patches separated to simplify the merging.
> that is intermediate thing, but Ideally this change belongs to 1/4 patch, so once I apply these patches then we can always rebase layout series on top of nvmem-next
Well, I still don't see the need for this patch because we have no use
for it *after* the introduction of layouts. Yes in some cases changing
the size of a cell might maybe be needed, but right now the use case is
to provide a MAC address, we know beforehand the size of the cell, so
there is no need, currently, for this hack.
Whatever. If you want it, just merge it. But *please*, I would like
to see these layouts in, so what's the plan?
Thanks,
Miquèl