Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Clarify description of returned value in some functions

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:16:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:33 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Some of the functions do not provide Return: section on absence of which
> > kernel-doc complains. Besides that several functions return the fwnode
> > handle with incremented reference count. Add a respective note to make sure
> > that the caller decrements it when it's not needed anymore.
> >
> > While at it, unify the style of the Return: sections.
> >
> > Reported-by: Daniel Kaehn <kaehndan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> or please let me know if I need to pick it up.

I can take it, thanks.

greg k-h