Re: [PATCH V2] dt-bindings: nvmem: layouts: add fixed-layout

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 9.03.2023 14:07, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2023-03-09 12:39, schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
> > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > With the introduction of NVMEM layouts we should prefer and support
> > describing all NVMEM devices content in the "nvmem-layout" node. That
> > inludes using it for fixed NVMEM cells (those with hardcoded offset &
> > size).
> >
> > This seems to be cleaner design and more explicit.
> >
> > Introduce a binding allowing fixed NVMEM cells as a type of layout. To
> > avoid code duplication put shared part in the fixed-cell.yaml.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I don't feel comfortable to add an acked-by or reviewed-by here
> because I don't do much with dt-bindings myself, but this looks
> good to me.

Thank you!


>  From a device tree binding POV, could there be a
>
> nvmem-layout@0 {
>    reg = <0>;
>    compatible = "layout1";
> };
>
> nvmem-layout@1000 {
>    reg = <1000>;
>    compatible = "layout2";
> };
>
> for partitioned eeproms for example?

Maybe. Could you send a patch adding such binding with a proper
explanation what devices need it, please? It's out of scope of this
patch.