RE: [PATCH v6 06/10] drm/i915/hdcp: Retain hdcp_capable return codes

From: Kandpal, Suraj
Date: Fri Mar 10 2023 - 03:25:49 EST

Next message: Jarkko Nikula: "Re: [PATCH] ASoC: do not include pm_runtime.h if not used"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH v2 000/101] fbdev: Fix memory leak in option parsing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Subject: [PATCH v6 06/10] drm/i915/hdcp: Retain hdcp_capable return codes
>
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The shim functions return error codes, but they are discarded in
> intel_hdcp.c. This patch plumbs the return codes through so they are
> properly handled.
>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Yacoub <markyacoub@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210913175747.47456-7-
> sean@xxxxxxxxxx #v1
> Link:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210915203834.1439-7-
> sean@xxxxxxxxxx #v2
> Link:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211001151145.55916-7-
> sean@xxxxxxxxxx #v3
> Link:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211105030434.2828845-
> 7-sean@xxxxxxxxxx #v4
> Link:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220411204741.1074308-
> 7-sean@xxxxxxxxxx #v5
>
> Changes in v2:
> -None
> Changes in v3:
> -None
> Changes in v4:
> -None
> Changes in v5:
> -None
> Changes in v6:
> -Rebased
>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 9 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 51 ++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h | 4 +-
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index 7c7253a2541c..13a4153bb76e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ static void intel_panel_info(struct seq_file *m, static
> void intel_hdcp_info(struct seq_file *m,
> struct intel_connector *intel_connector) {
> + int ret;
> bool hdcp_cap, hdcp2_cap;
>
> if (!intel_connector->hdcp.shim) {
> @@ -499,8 +500,12 @@ static void intel_hdcp_info(struct seq_file *m,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - hdcp_cap = intel_hdcp_capable(intel_connector);
> - hdcp2_cap = intel_hdcp2_capable(intel_connector);
> + ret = intel_hdcp_capable(intel_connector, &hdcp_cap);
> + if (ret)
> + hdcp_cap = false;
> + ret = intel_hdcp2_capable(intel_connector, &hdcp2_cap);
> + if (ret)
> + hdcp2_cap = false;
>

This does not seem to be adding value here as this error which you referred to as being ignored
is used both in case of hdmi and dp is being to determine if hdcp_cap or hdcp2 cap is true or false
which you basically reiterate here too
check the intel_dp_hdcp2_capable and intel_hdmi_hdcp2_capable .
this change in itself can be removed.

Regards,
Suraj Kandpal

> if (hdcp_cap)
> seq_puts(m, "HDCP1.4 ");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> index 0a20bc41be55..61a862ae1f28 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -177,50 +177,49 @@ int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port, }
>
> /* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Sink */ -bool
> intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +int intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector, bool
> +*capable)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = connector->hdcp.shim;
> - bool capable = false;
> u8 bksv[5];
>
> + *capable = false;
> +
> if (!shim)
> - return capable;
> + return 0;
>
> - if (shim->hdcp_capable) {
> - shim->hdcp_capable(dig_port, &capable);
> - } else {
> - if (!intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(dig_port, shim, bksv))
> - capable = true;
> - }
> + if (shim->hdcp_capable)
> + return shim->hdcp_capable(dig_port, capable);
> +
> + if (!intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(dig_port, shim, bksv))
> + *capable = true;
>
> - return capable;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* Is HDCP2.2 capable on Platform and Sink */ -bool
> intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +int intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector, bool
> +*capable)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> - bool capable = false;
> +
> + *capable = false;
>
> /* I915 support for HDCP2.2 */
> if (!hdcp->hdcp2_supported)
> - return false;
> + return 0;
>
> /* MEI interface is solid */
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->display.hdcp.comp_mutex);
> if (!dev_priv->display.hdcp.comp_added || !dev_priv-
> >display.hdcp.master) {
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->display.hdcp.comp_mutex);
> - return false;
> + return 0;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->display.hdcp.comp_mutex);
>
> /* Sink's capability for HDCP2.2 */
> - hdcp->shim->hdcp_2_2_capable(dig_port, &capable);
> -
> - return capable;
> + return hdcp->shim->hdcp_2_2_capable(dig_port, capable);
> }
>
> static bool intel_hdcp_in_use(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, @@ -
> 2355,6 +2354,7 @@ int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector
> *connector,
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> unsigned long check_link_interval = DRM_HDCP_CHECK_PERIOD_MS;
> + bool capable;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> if (!hdcp->shim)
> @@ -2373,21 +2373,27 @@ int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector
> *connector,
> * Considering that HDCP2.2 is more secure than HDCP1.4, If the
> setup
> * is capable of HDCP2.2, it is preferred to use HDCP2.2.
> */
> - if (intel_hdcp2_capable(connector)) {
> + ret = intel_hdcp2_capable(connector, &capable);
> + if (capable) {
> ret = _intel_hdcp2_enable(connector);
> - if (!ret)
> + if (!ret) {
> check_link_interval =
> DRM_HDCP2_CHECK_PERIOD_MS;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> * When HDCP2.2 fails and Content Type is not Type1, HDCP1.4 will
> * be attempted.
> */
> - if (ret && intel_hdcp_capable(connector) &&
> - hdcp->content_type != DRM_MODE_HDCP_CONTENT_TYPE1) {
> + ret = intel_hdcp_capable(connector, &capable);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (capable && hdcp->content_type !=
> DRM_MODE_HDCP_CONTENT_TYPE1)
> ret = _intel_hdcp_enable(connector);
> - }
>
> +out:
> if (!ret) {
> schedule_delayed_work(&hdcp->check_work,
> check_link_interval);
> intel_hdcp_update_value(connector,
> @@ -2395,7 +2401,6 @@ int intel_hdcp_enable(struct intel_connector
> *connector,
> true);
> }
>
> -out:
> mutex_unlock(&dig_port->hdcp_mutex);
> mutex_unlock(&hdcp->mutex);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> index 7c5fd84a7b65..f06f6e5a2b1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.h
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ void intel_hdcp_update_pipe(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
> bool is_hdcp_supported(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port
> port); -bool intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector); -bool
> intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector);
> +int intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector, bool
> +*capable); int intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector,
> +bool *capable);
> void intel_hdcp_component_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void
> intel_hdcp_component_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void
> intel_hdcp_cleanup(struct intel_connector *connector);
> --
> 2.39.0.246.g2a6d74b583-goog

Next message: Jarkko Nikula: "Re: [PATCH] ASoC: do not include pm_runtime.h if not used"
Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH v2 000/101] fbdev: Fix memory leak in option parsing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]