Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] use canonical ftrace path whenever possible

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:06:58 -0700
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 03:29:49AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 03:33:44PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:  
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >  * Dropped patches which were pulled into maintainer trees.
> > >  * Split BPF patches out into another series targeting bpf-next.
> > >  * trace-agent now falls back to debugfs if tracefs isn't present.
> > >  * Added Acked-by from mst@xxxxxxxxxx to series.
> > >  * Added a typo fixup for the virtio-trace README.
> > > 
> > > Steven, assuming there are no objections, would you feel comfortable
> > > taking this series through your tree?  
> > 
> > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > if you want the virtio patches through my tree after all, let me know.  
> 
> Yes, please, that would be great.  I'll send out v3 with the few patches that
> haven't gotten a response, but I'll drop the virtio patches assuming you've
> got them.
>

Since the last patch 6/6 is not tracing related, I would prefer it to go
through the virtio tree.

For patches 1-5, please add:

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

-- Steve