Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 08/18] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: fix 1000Base-X and 2500Base-X modes
From: Daniel Golle
Date: Sat Mar 11 2023 - 09:51:54 EST
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 02:26:13PM +0100, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 11. März 2023 um 13:05 Uhr
> > Von: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 08. März 2023 um 16:24 Uhr
> > > Von: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > It would be nice to add these to my database - please send me the
> > > > > output of ethtool -m $iface raw on > foo.bin for each module.
> > >
> > > so if you can do that for me, then I can see whether it's likely that
> > > the patches that are already in mainline will do anything to solve
> > > the workaround you've had to add for the hw signals.
> >
> > i got the 2.5G copper sfps, and tried them...they work well with the v12 (including this patch), but not in v13...
> >
> > i dumped the eeprom like you mention for your database:
> >
> > $ hexdump -C 2g5_sfp.bin
> > 00000000 03 04 07 00 01 00 00 00 00 02 00 05 19 00 00 00 |................|
> > 00000010 1e 14 00 00 4f 45 4d 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 |....OEM |
> > 00000020 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 00 53 46 50 2d 32 2e 35 47 | ....SFP-2.5G|
> > 00000030 2d 54 20 20 20 20 20 20 31 2e 30 20 03 52 00 19 |-T 1.0 .R..|
> > 00000040 00 1a 00 00 53 4b 32 33 30 31 31 31 30 30 30 38 |....SK2301110008|
> > 00000050 20 20 20 20 32 33 30 31 31 30 20 20 68 f0 01 e8 | 230110 h...|
> > 00000060 00 00 11 37 4f 7a dc ff 3d c0 6e 74 9b 7c 06 ca |...7Oz..=.nt.|..|
> > 00000070 e1 d0 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 f0 fc 64 |...............d|
> > 00000080 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
> > *
> > 00000100 5f 00 ce 00 5a 00 d3 00 8c a0 75 30 88 b8 79 18 |_...Z.....u0..y.|
> > 00000110 1d 4c 01 f4 19 64 03 e8 4d f0 06 30 3d e8 06 f2 |.L...d..M..0=...|
> > 00000120 2b d4 00 c7 27 10 00 df 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |+...'...........|
> > 00000130 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
> > 00000140 00 00 00 00 3f 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 |....?...........|
> > 00000150 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 |................|
> > 00000160 29 1a 82 41 0b b8 13 88 0f a0 ff ff ff ff 80 ff |)..A............|
> > 00000170 00 00 ff ff 00 00 ff ff 04 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 |................|
> > 00000180 43 4e 53 38 54 55 54 41 41 43 33 30 2d 31 34 31 |CNS8TUTAAC30-141|
> > 00000190 30 2d 30 34 56 30 34 20 49 fb 46 00 00 00 00 29 |0-04V04 I.F....)|
> > 000001a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
> > 000001b0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 aa aa |................|
> > 000001c0 47 4c 43 2d 54 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 |GLC-T |
> > 000001d0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 97 | .|
> > 000001e0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
> > 000001f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 40 00 00 00 00 |.........@.@....|
> >
> > how can we add a quirk to support this?
>
> tried to add the quirk like this onto v13
>
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> @@ -403,6 +403,8 @@ static const struct sfp_quirk sfp_quirks[] = {
> SFP_QUIRK_F("OEM", "RTSFP-10G", sfp_fixup_rollball_cc),
> SFP_QUIRK_F("Turris", "RTSFP-10", sfp_fixup_rollball),
> SFP_QUIRK_F("Turris", "RTSFP-10G", sfp_fixup_rollball),
> +
> + SFP_QUIRK_M("OEM", "SFP-2.5G-T", sfp_quirk_2500basex),
> };
>
> but still no link...
>
> how can i verify the quirk was applied? see only this in dmesg:
>
> [ 2.192274] sfp sfp-1: module OEM SFP-2.5G-T rev 1.0 sn SK2301110008 dc 230110
>
> also tried to force speed (module should support 100/1000/2500), but it seems i can set speed option only on
> gmac (eth1) and not on the sfp (phy).
>
> i guess between mac and sfp speed is always 2500base-X and after the phy (if there is any) the link speed is
> maybe different.
As discussed in the previous iteration of the series where I suggested to
add work-arounds disabling in-band AN for 1000Base-X and 2500Base-X having
those will also affect fiber transceivers which transparently pass-through
the electrical SerDes signal into light. Russell explained it very well
and I now agree that a good solution would be to add a new SFP quirk
indicating that a SFP module got a "hidden" PHY which doesn't like in-band
autonegotiation.
tl;dr What you are seeing is the expected behavior.
Try 'ethtool -s eth1 autoneg off', and the link should come up.
Cheers
Daniel
>
> regards Frank
>