[PATCH net-next] net: lan966x: Change lan966x_police_del return type
From: Horatiu Vultur
Date: Sun Mar 12 2023 - 15:52:39 EST
As the function always returns 0 change the return type to be
void instead of int. In this way also remove a wrong message
in case of error which would never happen.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c
index 7d66fe75cd3bf..7302df2300fd2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_police.c
@@ -49,8 +49,7 @@ static int lan966x_police_add(struct lan966x_port *port,
return 0;
}
-static int lan966x_police_del(struct lan966x_port *port,
- u16 pol_idx)
+static void lan966x_police_del(struct lan966x_port *port, u16 pol_idx)
{
struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x;
@@ -67,8 +66,6 @@ static int lan966x_police_del(struct lan966x_port *port,
lan_wr(ANA_POL_PIR_CFG_PIR_RATE_SET(GENMASK(14, 0)) |
ANA_POL_PIR_CFG_PIR_BURST_SET(0),
lan966x, ANA_POL_PIR_CFG(pol_idx));
-
- return 0;
}
static int lan966x_police_validate(struct lan966x_port *port,
@@ -186,7 +183,6 @@ int lan966x_police_port_del(struct lan966x_port *port,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x;
- int err;
if (port->tc.police_id != police_id) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
@@ -194,12 +190,7 @@ int lan966x_police_port_del(struct lan966x_port *port,
return -EINVAL;
}
- err = lan966x_police_del(port, POL_IDX_PORT + port->chip_port);
- if (err) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
- "Failed to add policer to port");
- return err;
- }
+ lan966x_police_del(port, POL_IDX_PORT + port->chip_port);
lan_rmw(ANA_POL_CFG_PORT_POL_ENA_SET(0) |
ANA_POL_CFG_POL_ORDER_SET(POL_ORDER),
--
2.38.0