Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] perf : fix counting when initial delay configured

[Changbin Du]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:05:38PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:37:14AM +0800, Changbin Du escreveu:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 05:40:16PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:22:37AM -0800, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 7:12 PM Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The first one fixes the problem that counters are never enabled  when initial
> > > > > delay configured.
> > > > > The remaining two reuse the common field target::initial_delay for
> > > > > record/ftrace/trace subcommands.
> > > > >
> > > > > v2:
> > > > >  - introduce common filed target::initial_delay
> > > > >
> > > > > Changbin Du (3):
> > > > >   perf stat: fix counting when initial delay configured
> > > > >   perf record: reuse target::initial_delay
> > > > >   perf: ftrace: reuse target::initial_delay
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Thanks, applying the first to perf-tools (old perf/urgent) and the rest
> > > to perf-tools-next (old perf/core).
> > > 
> > > - Arnaldo
> > > 
> > Hi Arnaldo, it seems only the first one is applied. The remaining two patches
> > are missed in your tree.
> >  - perf record: reuse target::initial_delay
> >  - perf: ftrace: reuse target::initial_delay
> 
> Those are not fixes, right? I mentioned that I would apply it after the
> first is merged.
>
Sorry, I misunderstood your previous reply :)

> - Arnaldo

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du