Hi Michael,
michael@xxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:08:15 +0100:
Hi,
please have a look at Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
how to properly format patches. But also see below.
Am 2023-03-13 11:01, schrieb Luke He:
> Signed-off-by: Luke He <sixuerain@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c
> index 051411e86339..6db01b80237f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,18 @@ static const struct flash_info xmc_nor_parts[] = {
> { "XM25QH128A", INFO(0x207018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256)
> NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> + { "XM25QH256C", INFO(0x204019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512)
> + NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> + SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) },
> + { "XM25QU256C", INFO(0x204119, 0, 64 * 1024, 512)
> + NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> + SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) },
> + { "XM25QH512C", INFO(0x204020, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024)
> + NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> + SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) },
> + { "XM25QU512C", INFO(0x204120, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024)
> + NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> + SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) }
I've just looked at XM25QH256C [1], but I suspect all of these
flashes supports SFDP, therefore you shouldn't use the NO_SFDP_FLAGS.
I didn't check, do we have a kdoc or something like that which explains
what flags to use and when?