Re: [PATCH net-next] net-sysfs: display two backlog queue len separately

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon Mar 13 2023 - 08:35:13 EST


On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 7:18 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sometimes we need to know which one of backlog queue can be exactly
> long enough to cause some latency when debugging this part is needed.
> Thus, we can then separate the display of both.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/core/net-procfs.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/net-procfs.c b/net/core/net-procfs.c
> index 1ec23bf8b05c..97a304e1957a 100644
> --- a/net/core/net-procfs.c
> +++ b/net/core/net-procfs.c
> @@ -115,10 +115,14 @@ static int dev_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static u32 softnet_backlog_len(struct softnet_data *sd)
> +static u32 softnet_input_pkt_queue_len(struct softnet_data *sd)
> {
> - return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->input_pkt_queue) +
> - skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->process_queue);
> + return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->input_pkt_queue);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 softnet_process_queue_len(struct softnet_data *sd)
> +{
> + return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->process_queue);
> }
>
> static struct softnet_data *softnet_get_online(loff_t *pos)
> @@ -169,12 +173,15 @@ static int softnet_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> * mapping the data a specific CPU
> */
> seq_printf(seq,
> - "%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
> + "%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x "
> + "%08x %08x\n",
> sd->processed, sd->dropped, sd->time_squeeze, 0,
> 0, 0, 0, 0, /* was fastroute */
> 0, /* was cpu_collision */
> sd->received_rps, flow_limit_count,
> - softnet_backlog_len(sd), (int)seq->index);
> + 0, /* was len of two backlog queues */

You can not pretend the sum is zero, some user space tools out there
would be fooled.

> + (int)seq->index,
> + softnet_input_pkt_queue_len(sd), softnet_process_queue_len(sd));
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.3
>

In general I would prefer we no longer change this file.

Perhaps add a tracepoint instead ?