Re: [PATCH] media: hantro: fix use after free bug in hantro_release due to race condition

From: Hans Verkuil
Date: Mon Mar 13 2023 - 09:47:39 EST


On 13/03/2023 14:45, Zheng Hacker wrote:
> Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> 于2023年3月13日周一 21:17写道:
>>
>> On 07/03/2023 16:35, Zheng Wang wrote:
>>> In hantro_probe, vpu->watchdog_work is bound with
>>> hantro_watchdog. Then hantro_end_prepare_run may
>>> be called to start the work.
>>>
>>> If we close the file or remove the module which will
>>> call hantro_release and hantro_remove to make cleanup,
>>> there may be a unfinished work. The possible sequence
>>> is as follows, which will cause a typical UAF bug.
>>>
>>> The same thing will happen in hantro_release, and use
>>> ctx after freeing it.
>>>
>>> Fix it by canceling the work before cleanup in hantro_release.
>>>
>>> CPU0 CPU1
>>>
>>> |hantro_watchdog
>>> hantro_remove |
>>> v4l2_m2m_release |
>>> kfree(m2m_dev); |
>>> |
>>> | v4l2_m2m_get_curr_priv
>>> | m2m_dev->curr_ctx //use
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
>>> index b0aeedae7b65..cf00ccaa7829 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
>>> @@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ static int hantro_release(struct file *filp)
>>> * No need for extra locking because this was the last reference
>>> * to this file.
>>> */
>>> + cancel_delayed_work(&vpu->watchdog_work);
>>> v4l2_m2m_ctx_release(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
>>> v4l2_fh_del(&ctx->fh);
>>> v4l2_fh_exit(&ctx->fh);
>>
>> drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c: In function ‘hantro_release’:
>> drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c:604:30: error: ‘vpu’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘fpu’?
>> 604 | cancel_delayed_work(&vpu->watchdog_work);
>> | ^~~
>> | fpu
>> drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c:604:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>>
>> You clearly didn't compile this patch!
>>
> Sorry for my mistake. I was hurried to report the issue and discuss
> with developer to confirm it . I'll complete it and test it locally.

Was this UAF actually observed, or is it theoretical?

Regards,

Hans

>
> Best regards,
> Zheng