RE: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: lan966x: Stop using packing library

From: David Laight
Date: Mon Mar 13 2023 - 13:06:41 EST


From: Horatiu Vultur
> Sent: 12 March 2023 20:24
>
> When a frame is injected from CPU, it is required to create an IFH(Inter
> frame header) which sits in front of the frame that is transmitted.
> This IFH, contains different fields like destination port, to bypass the
> analyzer, priotity, etc. Lan966x it is using packing library to set and
> get the fields of this IFH. But this seems to be an expensive
> operations.
> If this is changed with a simpler implementation, the RX will be
> improved with ~5Mbit while on the TX is a much bigger improvement as it
> is required to set more fields. Below are the numbers for TX.
...
> +static void lan966x_ifh_set(u8 *ifh, size_t val, size_t pos, size_t length)
> +{
> + u32 v = 0;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < length ; i++) {
> + int j = pos + i;
> + int k = j % 8;
> +
> + if (i == 0 || k == 0)
> + v = ifh[IFH_LEN_BYTES - (j / 8) - 1];
> +
> + if (val & (1 << i))
> + v |= (1 << k);
> +
> + if (i == (length - 1) || k == 7)
> + ifh[IFH_LEN_BYTES - (j / 8) - 1] = v;
> + }
> +}
> +

It has to be possible to do much better that that.
Given that 'pos' and 'length' are always constants it looks like
each call should reduce to (something like):
ifh[k] |= val << n;
ifk[k + 1] |= val >> (8 - n);
...
It might be that the compiler manages to do this, but I doubt it.

David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)