Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/rockchip: vop2: initialize possible_crtcs properly

From: Nathan Chancellor
Date: Tue Mar 14 2023 - 12:08:33 EST


Hi Michael,

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 06:47:01AM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
> The variable possible_crtcs is only initialized for primary and
> overlay planes. Since the VOP2 driver only supports these plane
> types at the moment, the current code is safe. However, in order
> to provide a future-proof solution, fix the initialization of
> the variable.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3:
> - no changes
> v2:
> - new patch
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> index 8cecf81a5ae0..374ef821b453 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> @@ -2322,10 +2322,11 @@ static int vop2_create_crtc(struct vop2 *vop2)
> /* change the unused primary window to overlay window */
> win->type = DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY;
> }
> - }
> -
> - if (win->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY)
> + } else if (win->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY) {
> possible_crtcs = (1 << nvps) - 1;
> + } else {
> + possible_crtcs = 0;
> + }
>
> ret = vop2_plane_init(vop2, win, possible_crtcs);
> if (ret) {
> --
> 2.30.2
>

This patch is now in -next as commit 368419a2d429 ("drm/rockchip: vop2:
initialize possible_crtcs properly") and it actually appears to
introduce a path where possible_crtcs could be used uninitialized.

drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:2316:8: error: variable 'possible_crtcs' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (vp) {
^~
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:2330:36: note: uninitialized use occurs here
ret = vop2_plane_init(vop2, win, possible_crtcs);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:2316:4: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
if (vp) {
^~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:2298:21: note: initialize the variable 'possible_crtcs' to silence this warning
u32 possible_crtcs;
^
= 0
1 error generated.

Prior to this change, if that else path was hit, clang recognized based on
the assignment that the next if statement would always be true. Now, if
the else path is taken, the possible_crtcs assignment will be missed. Is
that intentional?

Cheers,
Nathan