Re: [PATCH net] vmxnet3: use gro callback when UPT is enabled
From: Yunsheng Lin
Date: Tue Mar 14 2023 - 21:51:55 EST
On 2023/3/15 5:09, Ronak Doshi wrote:
>
> > On 3/9/23, 5:02 PM, "Yunsheng Lin" <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> So it is a run time thing? What happens if some LRO'ed packet is put in the rx queue,
>> and the the vnic switches the mode to UPT, is it ok for those LRO'ed packets to go through
>> the software GSO processing?
> Yes, it should be fine.
>
>> If yes, why not just call napi_gro_receive() for LRO case too?
>>
> We had done perf measurements in the past and it turned out this results in perf penalty.
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/1308947605-4300-1-git-send-email-jesse@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> In fact, internally recently we did some perf measurements on RHEL 9.0, and it still showed some penalty.
Does clearing the NETIF_F_GRO for netdev->features bring back the performance?
If no, maybe there is something need investigating.
>
>> Looking closer, it seems vnic is implementing hw GRO from driver' view, as the driver is
>> setting skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_* accordingly:
>>
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Flatest%2Fsource%2Fdrivers%2Fnet%2Fvmxnet3%2Fvmxnet3_drv.c%23L1665&data=05%7C01%7Cdoshir%40vmware.com%7C68e4b3dbd7d948887f0808db21031e2c%>7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638140069565449054%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LAw6oCG2MgYH4TPQAnWUy25E2u%2FDMSW2aSJ7OY2%2FOu8%3D&reserved=0 <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Flatest%2Fsource%2Fdrivers%2Fnet%2Fvmxnet3%2Fvmxnet3_drv.c%23L1665&data=05%7C01%7Cdoshir%40vmware.com%7C68e4b3dbd7d948887f0808db21031e2c%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638140069565449054%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LAw6oCG2MgYH4TPQAnWUy25E2u%2FDMSW2aSJ7OY2%2FOu8%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>>
>> In that case, you may call napi_gro_receive() for those GRO'ed skb too, see:
>>
>
> I see. Seems this got added recently. This will need re-evaluation by the team based on ToT Linux.
> But this can be done in near future and as this might take time, for now this patch should be applied as
> UPT patches are already up-streamed.
Checking rq->shared->updateRxProd in the driver to decide if gro is allow does not seems right to
me, as the netstack has used the NETIF_F_GRO checking in netif_elide_gro().
Does clearing NETIF_F_GRO for netdev->features during the driver init process works for your
case?
As netdev->hw_features is for the driver to advertise the hw's capability, and the driver
can enable/disable specific capability by setting netdev->features during the driver init
process, and user can get to enable/disable specific capability using ethtool later if user
need to.
>
> Thanks,
> Ronak
>
>