Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any priority

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:32:06 PST (-0800), dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2/19/23 02:20, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > On 2/14/23 18:17, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> ...
> > > Sorry for being slow here, I'd been assuming someone would Ack this but
> > > it looks like maybe there's nobody in the maintainers file for
> > > kernel/reboot.c?  I'm fine taking this via the RISC-V tree if that's OK
> > > with people, but the cover letter suggests the patch is necessary for
> > > multiple patch sets.
> >
> > See also Dmitry's reply[0] to the PSCI thread. (Maybe I should have sent
> > both conversions as one series?)
> >
> > I am happy with the patches going through any tree. The kernel/reboot.c
> > patch is exactly the same between the two series, so it should not hurt
> > if it gets merged twice. Though if you take this series through the
> > RISC-V tree, maybe you want to create a tag for it?
> >
> > I am not sure exactly what needs to be done here; I am happy to do
> > anything that would assist getting both series merged for v6.3, to avoid
> > a regression with axp20x[1].
> >
> > Regards,
> > Samuel
> >
> > [0]:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0a180849-ba1b-2a82-ab06-ed1b8155d5ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > [1]:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e38d29f5-cd3c-4a2b-b355-2bcfad00a24b@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> The reboot.c changes should be acked/applied by Rafael.
> I noticed that you haven't CC'd the linux-pm ML, maybe that's why it
> hasn't got the attention.

OK, I'm adding them here.  Not sure if we're ment to re-send it to the 
list, no rush on my end I'm just scrubbing through some old stuff on 
patchwork again.