Re: [PATCH v13 003/113] KVM: TDX: Initialize the TDX module when loading the KVM intel kernel module
From: Isaku Yamahata
Date: Wed Mar 15 2023 - 03:27:26 EST
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:38:06AM +0000,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-03-12 at 10:55 -0700, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > +int __init tdx_hardware_setup(struct kvm_x86_ops *x86_ops)
> > +{
> > + int r;
> > +
> > + if (!enable_ept) {
> > + pr_warn("Cannot enable TDX with EPT disabled\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* tdx_enable() in tdx_module_setup() requires cpus lock. */
> > + cpus_read_lock();
> > + /* TDX requires VMX. */
> > + r = vmxon_all();
>
> Why not using hardware_enable_all()?
>
> > + if (!r) {
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Because tdx_cpu_enabel() acquire spin locks, on_each_cpu()
> > + * can't be used.
> > + */
> > + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > + if (smp_call_on_cpu(cpu, tdx_cpu_enable_cpu, NULL, false))
> > + r = -EIO;
> > + }
> > + if (!r)
> > + r = tdx_module_setup();
> > + }
> > + vmxoff_all();
> > + cpus_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + return r;
> > +}
>
> I think you should use hardware_enable_all(), and just do something similar to
> below in vmx_hardware_enable():
The use of hardware_enable_all() make us circle back to refactoring KVM
hardware initialization topic. I'd like to stay away from it for now for TDX.
I find that vmxon_all() is unnecessary and we can move VMXON to
tdx_cpu_enable_cpu().
Here is the version of dropping vmxon_all().