Re: [PATCH v3 02/38] ata: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Damien,

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:12 AM Damien Le Moal
<damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 3/15/23 17:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:12 PM Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> >> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> >> those drivers using them.
> >>
> >> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> >> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> >> @@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ endif # HAS_DMA
> >>
> >>  config ATA_SFF
> >>         bool "ATA SFF support (for legacy IDE and PATA)"
> >> +       depends on HAS_IOPORT
> >>         default y
> >>         help
> >>           This option adds support for ATA controllers with SFF
> >
> > ATA_SFF is a dependency for lots of (S)ATA drivers.
> > (at least) The following don't use I/O port access:
> >
> >     CONFIG_SATA_RCAR (arm/arm64)
> >     CONFIG_PATA_FALCON (m68k/atari and m68k/q40)
> >     CONFIG_PATA_GAYLE (m68k/amiga)
> >     CONFIG_PATA_BUDDHA (m68k/amiga)
> >
> > (at least) The following can use either MMIO or I/O port accesses:
> >
> >     CONFIG_PATA_PLATFORM (m68k/mac)
>
> But for these arch/platforms, would there be any reason to not have HAS_IOPORT ?
> It is supported right now, so we should have HAS_IOPORT for them.

That's the point: on Amiga and Atari, HAS_IOPORT is optional, and
not related to IDE support. On Mac, it is never present.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds