Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: lan966x: Stop using packing library

From: 'Horatiu Vultur'
Date: Wed Mar 15 2023 - 09:34:24 EST


The 03/13/2023 17:04, David Laight wrote:
>
> From: Horatiu Vultur
> > Sent: 12 March 2023 20:24
> >
> > When a frame is injected from CPU, it is required to create an IFH(Inter
> > frame header) which sits in front of the frame that is transmitted.
> > This IFH, contains different fields like destination port, to bypass the
> > analyzer, priotity, etc. Lan966x it is using packing library to set and
> > get the fields of this IFH. But this seems to be an expensive
> > operations.
> > If this is changed with a simpler implementation, the RX will be
> > improved with ~5Mbit while on the TX is a much bigger improvement as it
> > is required to set more fields. Below are the numbers for TX.
> ...
> > +static void lan966x_ifh_set(u8 *ifh, size_t val, size_t pos, size_t length)
> > +{
> > + u32 v = 0;
> > +
> > + for (int i = 0; i < length ; i++) {
> > + int j = pos + i;
> > + int k = j % 8;
> > +
> > + if (i == 0 || k == 0)
> > + v = ifh[IFH_LEN_BYTES - (j / 8) - 1];
> > +
> > + if (val & (1 << i))
> > + v |= (1 << k);
> > +
> > + if (i == (length - 1) || k == 7)
> > + ifh[IFH_LEN_BYTES - (j / 8) - 1] = v;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
>
> It has to be possible to do much better that that.
> Given that 'pos' and 'length' are always constants it looks like
> each call should reduce to (something like):
> ifh[k] |= val << n;
> ifk[k + 1] |= val >> (8 - n);
> ...
> It might be that the compiler manages to do this, but I doubt it.

Thanks for the review. I will update this in the next version.

Do you think it is worth updating the code in lan966x_ifh_get to use
byte access and not to read each bit individually?
As there is no much improvement on the RX side that is using lan966x_ifh_get.

>
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
>

--
/Horatiu