Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] ftrace: Store direct called addresses in their ops

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Mar 15 2023 - 19:45:12 EST


On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 19:21:29 +0100
Florent Revest <revest@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> @@ -5445,6 +5445,7 @@ __modify_ftrace_direct(struct ftrace_ops *ops, unsigned long addr)
> /* Enable the tmp_ops to have the same functions as the direct ops */
> ftrace_ops_init(&tmp_ops);
> tmp_ops.func_hash = ops->func_hash;
> + tmp_ops.direct_call = addr;
>
> err = register_ftrace_function_nolock(&tmp_ops);
> if (err)
> @@ -5466,6 +5467,7 @@ __modify_ftrace_direct(struct ftrace_ops *ops, unsigned long addr)
> entry->direct = addr;
> }
> }
> + WRITE_ONCE(ops->direct_call, addr);

I'm curious about the use of WRITE_ONCE(). It should not go outside the
mutex barrier.

-- Steve

>
> mutex_unlock(&ftrace_lock);
>