Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: dsa: b53: mmap: register MDIO Mux bus controller

[Álvaro Fernández Rojas]

El vie, 17 mar 2023 a las 15:29, Vladimir Oltean (<olteanv@xxxxxxxxx>) escribió:
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 03:17:12PM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> > > The proposed solution is too radical for a problem that was not properly
> > > characterized yet, so this patch set has my temporary NACK.
> >
> > Forgive me, but why do you consider this solution too radical?
>
> Because it involves changing device tree bindings (stable ABI) in an
> incompatible way.
>
> > >
> > > > But maybe Florian or Jonas can give some more details about the issue...
> > >
> > > I think you also have the tools necessary to investigate this further.
> > > We need to know what resource belonging to the switch is it that the
> > > MDIO mux needs. Where is the earliest place you can add the call to
> > > b53_mmap_mdiomux_init() such that your board works reliably? Note that
> > > b53_switch_register() indirectly calls b53_setup(). By placing this
> > > function where you have, the entirety of b53_setup() has finished
> > > execution, and we don't know exactly what is it from there that is
> > > needed.
> >
> > In the following link you will find different bootlogs related to
> > different scenarios all of them with the same result: any attempt of
> > calling b53_mmap_mdiomux_init() earlier than b53_switch_register()
> > will either result in a kernel panic or a device hang:
> > https://gist.github.com/Noltari/b0bd6d5211160ac7bf349d998d21e7f7
> >
> > 1. before b53_switch_register():
> >
> > 2. before dsa_register_switch():
> >
> > 3. before b53_switch_init():
>
> Did you read what I said?

Yes, but I didn't get your point, sorry for that.

>
> | Note that b53_switch_register() indirectly calls b53_setup(). By placing
> | this function where you have, the entirety of b53_setup() has finished
> | execution, and we don't know exactly what is it from there that is
> | needed.
>
> Can you place the b53_mmap_mdiomux_init() in various places within
> b53_setup() to restrict the search further?

I tried and these are the results:
https://gist.github.com/Noltari/d5bdba66b8f2e392c9e4c2759661d862

All of them hang when dsa_tree_setup() is called for DSA tree 1
(external switch) without having completely setup DSA tree 0 (internal
switch):
[ 1.471345] b53-switch 10e00000.switch: found switch: BCM63xx, rev 0
[ 1.481099] bcm6368-enetsw 1000d800.ethernet: IRQ tx not found
[ 1.506752] bcm6368-enetsw 1000d800.ethernet: mtd mac 4c:60:de:86:52:12
[ 1.594365] bcm7038-wdt 1000005c.watchdog: Registered BCM7038 Watchdog
[ 1.612008] NET: Registered PF_INET6 protocol family
[ 1.645617] Segment Routing with IPv6
[ 1.649547] In-situ OAM (IOAM) with IPv6
[ 1.653948] NET: Registered PF_PACKET protocol family
[ 1.659984] 8021q: 802.1Q VLAN Support v1.8
[ 1.699193] b53-switch 10e00000.switch: found switch: BCM63xx, rev 0
[ 2.124257] bcm53xx 0.1:1e: found switch: BCM53125, rev 4
*** Device hang ***

I don't know if there's a way to defer the probe of DSA tree 1 (the
external switch) until DSA tree 0 (the internal switch) is completely
setup, because that would probably be the only alternative way of
fixing this.

--
Álvaro.