Re: [PATCH] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with spinlock_t for PREEMPT_RT.

[Mike Galbraith]

On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 13:07 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (23/03/23 17:18), Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Mike most likely stumbled upon it while running LTP.
>
> Yeah, I'm curious if anyone uses zram in preempt-rt systems. I don't
> mind this patch but would be nice to add new code when it solves some
> real problems. Maybe `depend on !PREEMPT_RT` can be a better option.

Patchlet's job here is only obese config RT vs !RT testing.  It can
always move back into local_patches, it won't be lonely ;-)

	-Mike