[PATCH] memblock: Make memblock memblock_dbg info handle overflowing range @base + @size

[纪宏宾]

Allow memblock users to specify range where @base + @size overflows,
This will cause the address range information in the debug output to
be displayed incorrectly.

For example, calling memblock_remove(1ULL << PHYS_MASK_SHIFT,
ULLONG_MAX) in arch/arm64/mm/init.c,
would be displayed as:
[ 0.000000] memblock_remove: [0x0001000000000000-0x0000fffffffffffe]
arm64_memblock_init+0x24/0x270
but we expect the output:
[ 0.000000] memblock_remove: [0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
arm64_memblock_init+0x24/0x270

Signed-off-by: Hongbin Ji <jhb_ee@xxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 25fd0626a9e7..567b99e4355d 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static int __init_memblock
memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
 int __init_memblock memblock_add_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
        int nid, enum memblock_flags flags)
 {
- phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
+ phys_addr_t end = base + min(size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX - base + 1) - 1;

  memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] nid=%d flags=%x %pS\n", __func__,
       &base, &end, nid, flags, (void *)_RET_IP_);
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add_node(phys_addr_t
base, phys_addr_t size,
  */
 int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
- phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
+ phys_addr_t end = base + min(size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX - base + 1) - 1;

  memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
       &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static int __init_memblock
memblock_remove_range(struct memblock_type *type,

 int __init_memblock memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
- phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
+ phys_addr_t end = base + min(size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX - base + 1) - 1;

  memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
       &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
@@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ void __init_memblock memblock_free(void *ptr, size_t size)
  */
 int __init_memblock memblock_phys_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
- phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
+ phys_addr_t end = base + min(size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX - base + 1) - 1;

  memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
       &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_phys_free(phys_addr_t
base, phys_addr_t size)

 int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
- phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
+ phys_addr_t end = base + min(size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX - base + 1) - 1;

  memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
       &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
@@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t
base, phys_addr_t size)
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
 int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
- phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
+ phys_addr_t end = base + min(size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX - base + 1) - 1;

  memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
       &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
@@ -1645,7 +1645,7 @@ void __init memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base,
phys_addr_t size)
 {
  phys_addr_t cursor, end;

- end = base + size - 1;
+ end = base + min(size, PHYS_ADDR_MAX - base + 1) - 1;
  memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
       __func__, &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
  kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
-- 
2.34.1