Re: [PATCH 0/5]scsi:scsi_debug: Add error injection for single device

From: Bart Van Assche
Date: Fri Mar 24 2023 - 12:02:08 EST

Next message: Miquel Raynal: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157"
Previous message: Philipp Rudo: "Re: [PATCH v3] kexec: Support purgatories with .text.hot sections"
Next in thread: Douglas Gilbert: "Re: [PATCH 0/5]scsi:scsi_debug: Add error injection for single device"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 3/23/23 20:42, haowenchao (C) wrote:

If sysfs is not recommended, what about proc?

procfs is for process information and should not be used for any other purpose.

Thanks,

Bart.

Next message: Miquel Raynal: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157"
Previous message: Philipp Rudo: "Re: [PATCH v3] kexec: Support purgatories with .text.hot sections"
Next in thread: Douglas Gilbert: "Re: [PATCH 0/5]scsi:scsi_debug: Add error injection for single device"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]