Re: [PATCH v2] selinux: clean up dead code after removing runtime disable

[Paul Moore]

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 5:23 AM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit f22f9aaf6c3d ("selinux: remove the runtime disable functionality")
> removes the config SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE. This results in some dead code
> in lsm_hooks.h.
>
> Remove this dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 23 -----------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)

Thanks Lukas, this looks much better.  Merged into selinux/next.

> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index 2b04f94a31bd..ab2b2fafa4a4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -117,29 +117,6 @@ extern struct lsm_info __start_early_lsm_info[], __end_early_lsm_info[];
>                 __used __section(".early_lsm_info.init")                \
>                 __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long))
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE
> -/*
> - * Assuring the safety of deleting a security module is up to
> - * the security module involved. This may entail ordering the
> - * module's hook list in a particular way, refusing to disable
> - * the module once a policy is loaded or any number of other
> - * actions better imagined than described.
> - *
> - * The name of the configuration option reflects the only module
> - * that currently uses the mechanism. Any developer who thinks
> - * disabling their module is a good idea needs to be at least as
> - * careful as the SELinux team.
> - */
> -static inline void security_delete_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks,
> -                                               int count)
> -{
> -       int i;
> -
> -       for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> -               hlist_del_rcu(&hooks[i].list);
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE */
> -
>  extern int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode);
>
>  #endif /* ! __LINUX_LSM_HOOKS_H */
> --
> 2.17.1

-- 
paul-moore.com