Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: kdump : take off the protection on crashkernel memory region

From: Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2023 - 21:56:49 EST




On 2023/3/24 21:18, Baoquan He wrote:
> Problem:
> =======
> On arm64, block and section mapping is supported to build page tables.
> However, currently it enforces to take base page mapping for the whole
> linear mapping if CONFIG_ZONE_DMA or CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is enabled and
> crashkernel kernel parameter is set. This will cause longer time of the
> linear mapping process during bootup and severe performance degradation
> during running time.
>
> Root cause:
> ==========
> On arm64, crashkernel reservation relies on knowing the upper limit of
> low memory zone because it needs to reserve memory in the zone so that
> devices' DMA addressing in kdump kernel can be satisfied. However, the
> upper limit of low memory on arm64 is variant. And the upper limit can
> only be decided late till bootmem_init() is called [1].
>
> And we need to map the crashkernel region with base page granularity when
> doing linear mapping, because kdump needs to protect the crashkernel region
> via set_memory_valid(,0) after kdump kernel loading. However, arm64 doesn't
> support well on splitting the built block or section mapping due to some
> cpu reststriction [2]. And unfortunately, the linear mapping is done before
> bootmem_init().
>
> To resolve the above conflict on arm64, the compromise is enforcing to
> take base page mapping for the entire linear mapping if crashkernel is
> set, and CONFIG_ZONE_DMA or CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is enabed. Hence
> performance is sacrificed.
>
> Solution:
> =========
> Comparing with the base page mapping for the whole linear region, it's
> better to take off the protection on crashkernel memory region for the
> time being because the anticipated stamping on crashkernel memory region
> could only happen in a chance in one million, while the base page mapping
> for the whole linear region is mitigating arm64 systems with crashkernel
> set always.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/YrIIJkhKWSuAqkCx@xxxxxxx/T/#u
>
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190911182546.17094-1-nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx/T/
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h | 6 ------
> arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 20 --------------------
> 2 files changed, 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> index 559bfae26715..9ac9572a3bbe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -102,12 +102,6 @@ void cpu_soft_restart(unsigned long el2_switch, unsigned long entry,
>
> int machine_kexec_post_load(struct kimage *image);
> #define machine_kexec_post_load machine_kexec_post_load
> -
> -void arch_kexec_protect_crashkres(void);
> -#define arch_kexec_protect_crashkres arch_kexec_protect_crashkres
> -
> -void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void);
> -#define arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres
> #endif
>
> #define ARCH_HAS_KIMAGE_ARCH
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index ce3d40120f72..22da7fc1ff50 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -268,26 +268,6 @@ void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> pr_info("Starting crashdump kernel...\n");
> }
>
> -void arch_kexec_protect_crashkres(void)
> -{
> - int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < kexec_crash_image->nr_segments; i++)
> - set_memory_valid(
> - __phys_to_virt(kexec_crash_image->segment[i].mem),
> - kexec_crash_image->segment[i].memsz >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
> -}
> -
> -void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void)
> -{
> - int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < kexec_crash_image->nr_segments; i++)
> - set_memory_valid(
> - __phys_to_virt(kexec_crash_image->segment[i].mem),
> - kexec_crash_image->segment[i].memsz >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1);
> -}
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> /*
> * To preserve the crash dump kernel image, the relevant memory segments
>

Reviewed-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Regards,
Zhen Lei