Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: it6505: Add lock for it6505 i2c bank

From: Hsin-Yi Wang
Date: Sat Mar 25 2023 - 02:17:34 EST

Next message: Liu Shixin: "[PATCH -next v7 1/4] mm/zswap: remove zswap_entry_cache_{create,destroy} helper function"
Previous message: Mike Rapoport: "[PATCH v3 14/14] xtensa: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text"
In reply to: Hsin-Yi Wang: "Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: it6505: Add lock for it6505 i2c bank"
Next in thread: Hsin-Yi Wang: "Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: it6505: Add lock for it6505 i2c bank"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:34 PM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 8:18 PM Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 24.03.2023 08:29, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > > From: xiazhengqiao <xiazhengqiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > When the i2c bank register (REG_BANK_SEL) is set to 1,
> > > only the registers belong to bank 1 can be written.
> > > There will be a race condition when a process is writing
> > > bank 0 registers while another process set the bank to 1.
> > > Add a mutex to handle regmap read/write locking for
> > > registers in multiple i2c bank. Since the driver now
> > > owns the lock, there's no need to use regmap API's lock.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: xiazhengqiao <xiazhengqiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > > index bc451b2a77c28..1a8dcc49fc1ee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> > > @@ -258,12 +258,12 @@
> > > #define REG_AUD_INFOFRAM_SUM 0xFB
> > >
> > > /* the following six registers are in bank1 */
> > > -#define REG_DRV_0_DB_800_MV 0x7E
> > > -#define REG_PRE_0_DB_800_MV 0x7F
> > > -#define REG_PRE_3P5_DB_800_MV 0x81
> > > -#define REG_SSC_CTRL0 0x88
> > > -#define REG_SSC_CTRL1 0x89
> > > -#define REG_SSC_CTRL2 0x8A
> > > +#define REG_DRV_0_DB_800_MV 0x17E
> > > +#define REG_PRE_0_DB_800_MV 0x17F
> > > +#define REG_PRE_3P5_DB_800_MV 0x181
> > > +#define REG_SSC_CTRL0 0x188
> > > +#define REG_SSC_CTRL1 0x189
> > > +#define REG_SSC_CTRL2 0x18A
> > >
> > > #define RBR DP_LINK_BW_1_62
> > > #define HBR DP_LINK_BW_2_7
> > > @@ -414,12 +414,14 @@ struct it6505 {
> > > struct mutex extcon_lock;
> > > struct mutex mode_lock; /* used to bridge_detect */
> > > struct mutex aux_lock; /* used to aux data transfers */
> > > + struct mutex bank_lock; /* used to protect i2c bank access */
> > > struct regmap *regmap;
> > > struct drm_display_mode source_output_mode;
> > > struct drm_display_mode video_info;
> > > struct notifier_block event_nb;
> > > struct extcon_dev *extcon;
> > > struct work_struct extcon_wq;
> > > + int bank_state; /* 1 indicates bank 1, 0 indicates bank 0 */
> > > int extcon_state;
> > > enum drm_connector_status connector_status;
> > > enum link_train_status link_state;
> > > @@ -502,8 +504,22 @@ static const struct regmap_config it6505_regmap_config = {
> > > .val_bits = 8,
> > > .volatile_table = &it6505_bridge_volatile_table,
> > > .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> > > + .disable_locking = true,
> > > + .can_sleep = true,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static int it6505_config_bank(struct it6505 *it6505, unsigned int reg_addr)
> > > +{
> > > + int err = 0, target = !!(reg_addr > 0xff);
> > > +
> > > + if (target != it6505->bank_state) {
> >
> > It would be better to return if equal, this way you can avoid indentation.
> >
> Will fix in v2.
> > > + err = regmap_write(it6505->regmap, REG_BANK_SEL, target);
> > > + if (!err)
> > > + it6505->bank_state = target;
> > > + }
> > > + return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int it6505_read(struct it6505 *it6505, unsigned int reg_addr)
> > > {
> > > unsigned int value;
> > > @@ -513,7 +529,10 @@ static int it6505_read(struct it6505 *it6505, unsigned int reg_addr)
> > > if (!it6505->powered)
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > - err = regmap_read(it6505->regmap, reg_addr, &value);
> > > + mutex_lock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + err = it6505_config_bank(it6505, reg_addr);
> > > + err |= regmap_read(it6505->regmap, reg_addr & 0xff, &value);
> >
> > Shoudn't be rather if (!err) err = regmap_read(...) ?
> >
> Will fix in v2.
> > > + mutex_unlock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > if (err < 0) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "read failed reg[0x%x] err: %d", reg_addr, err);
> > > return err;
> > > @@ -531,8 +550,10 @@ static int it6505_write(struct it6505 *it6505, unsigned int reg_addr,
> > > if (!it6505->powered)
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > - err = regmap_write(it6505->regmap, reg_addr, reg_val);
> > > -
> > > + mutex_lock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + err = it6505_config_bank(it6505, reg_addr);
> > > + err |= regmap_write(it6505->regmap, reg_addr & 0xff, reg_val);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > if (err < 0) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "write failed reg[0x%x] = 0x%x err = %d",
> > > reg_addr, reg_val, err);
> > > @@ -551,7 +572,10 @@ static int it6505_set_bits(struct it6505 *it6505, unsigned int reg,
> > > if (!it6505->powered)
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > - err = regmap_update_bits(it6505->regmap, reg, mask, value);
> > > + mutex_lock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + err = it6505_config_bank(it6505, reg);
> > > + err |= regmap_update_bits(it6505->regmap, reg & 0xff, mask, value);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > if (err < 0) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "write reg[0x%x] = 0x%x mask = 0x%x failed err %d",
> > > reg, value, mask, err);
> > > @@ -892,7 +916,10 @@ static void it6505_aux_reset(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > >
> > > static void it6505_reset_logic(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > > {
> > > + mutex_lock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + it6505_config_bank(it6505, REG_RESET_CTRL);
> > > regmap_write(it6505->regmap, REG_RESET_CTRL, ALL_LOGIC_RESET);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> >
> > Why not call it6505_write ?
> Will fix in v2.
> > > usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -972,9 +999,14 @@ static ssize_t it6505_aux_operation(struct it6505 *it6505,
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_AUX_ADR_16_19,
> > > ((address >> 16) & 0x0F) | ((size - 1) << 4));
> > >
> > > - if (cmd == CMD_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE)
> > > + if (cmd == CMD_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE) {
> > > + mutex_lock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + it6505_config_bank(it6505, REG_AUX_OUT_DATA0);
> > > regmap_bulk_write(it6505->regmap, REG_AUX_OUT_DATA0, buffer,
> > > size);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > >
> > > /* Aux Fire */
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_AUX_CMD_REQ, cmd);
> > > @@ -1197,9 +1229,12 @@ static int it6505_send_video_infoframe(struct it6505 *it6505,
> > > if (err)
> > > return err;
> > >
> > > - err = regmap_bulk_write(it6505->regmap, REG_AVI_INFO_DB1,
> > > + mutex_lock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + err = it6505_config_bank(it6505, REG_AVI_INFO_DB1);
> > > + err |= regmap_bulk_write(it6505->regmap, REG_AVI_INFO_DB1,
> > > buffer + HDMI_INFOFRAME_HEADER_SIZE,
> > > frame->length);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> >
> > Common code with it6505_aux_operation, maybe it6505_bulk_write ?
> Will fix in v2.
> >
> > Have you checked if regmap does not support banking? IMO it should be
> > implemented there.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. Do you mean regmap_field*? I think the
> banking in that series of API is different to the use case here. Since
> we would need to additionally set REG_BANK_SEL to 0 or 1, we still
> need a similar approach to this patch.
> We can also use regmap_multi_reg_write() to carry REG_BANK_SEL and the
> reg we want to write but that would have set REG_BANK_SEL multiple
> times unnecessarily (eg. a consequent write on 2 regs on bank 0
> doesn't need to write REG_BANK_SEL to 0 again on the second one.)
>
We should set selector_reg which should solve the issue.

>
> >
> > Regards
> > Andrzej
> >
> > > if (err)
> > > return err;
> > >
> > > @@ -1267,7 +1302,6 @@ static void it6505_init(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_TIME_STMP_CTRL,
> > > EN_SSC_GAT | EN_ENHANCE_VID_STMP | EN_ENHANCE_AUD_STMP);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_INFOFRAME_CTRL, 0x00);
> > > - it6505_write(it6505, REG_BANK_SEL, 0x01);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_DRV_0_DB_800_MV,
> > > afe_setting_table[it6505->afe_setting][0]);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_PRE_0_DB_800_MV,
> > > @@ -1277,7 +1311,6 @@ static void it6505_init(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_SSC_CTRL0, 0x9E);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_SSC_CTRL1, 0x1C);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_SSC_CTRL2, 0x42);
> > > - it6505_write(it6505, REG_BANK_SEL, 0x00);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void it6505_video_disable(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > > @@ -1506,11 +1539,9 @@ static void it6505_setup_ssc(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > > it6505_set_bits(it6505, REG_TRAIN_CTRL0, SPREAD_AMP_5,
> > > it6505->enable_ssc ? SPREAD_AMP_5 : 0x00);
> > > if (it6505->enable_ssc) {
> > > - it6505_write(it6505, REG_BANK_SEL, 0x01);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_SSC_CTRL0, 0x9E);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_SSC_CTRL1, 0x1C);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_SSC_CTRL2, 0x42);
> > > - it6505_write(it6505, REG_BANK_SEL, 0x00);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_SP_CTRL0, 0x07);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_IP_CTRL1, 0x29);
> > > it6505_write(it6505, REG_IP_CTRL2, 0x03);
> > > @@ -1983,8 +2014,11 @@ static int it6505_setup_sha1_input(struct it6505 *it6505, u8 *sha1_input)
> > > it6505_set_bits(it6505, REG_HDCP_CTRL2, HDCP_EN_M0_READ,
> > > HDCP_EN_M0_READ);
> > >
> > > - err = regmap_bulk_read(it6505->regmap, REG_M0_0_7,
> > > + mutex_lock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + err = it6505_config_bank(it6505, REG_M0_0_7);
> > > + err |= regmap_bulk_read(it6505->regmap, REG_M0_0_7,
> > > sha1_input + msg_count, 8);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > >
> > > it6505_set_bits(it6505, REG_HDCP_CTRL2, HDCP_EN_M0_READ, 0x00);
> > >
> > > @@ -2577,6 +2611,9 @@ static int it6505_poweron(struct it6505 *it6505)
> > > }
> > >
> > > it6505->powered = true;
> > > + mutex_lock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > + it6505->bank_state = 0;
> > > + mutex_unlock(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > > it6505_reset_logic(it6505);
> > > it6505_int_mask_enable(it6505);
> > > it6505_init(it6505);
> > > @@ -3359,6 +3396,7 @@ static int it6505_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > mutex_init(&it6505->extcon_lock);
> > > mutex_init(&it6505->mode_lock);
> > > mutex_init(&it6505->aux_lock);
> > > + mutex_init(&it6505->bank_lock);
> > >
> > > it6505->bridge.of_node = client->dev.of_node;
> > > it6505->connector_status = connector_status_disconnected;
> >

Next message: Liu Shixin: "[PATCH -next v7 1/4] mm/zswap: remove zswap_entry_cache_{create,destroy} helper function"
Previous message: Mike Rapoport: "[PATCH v3 14/14] xtensa: reword ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER prompt and help text"
In reply to: Hsin-Yi Wang: "Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: it6505: Add lock for it6505 i2c bank"
Next in thread: Hsin-Yi Wang: "Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: it6505: Add lock for it6505 i2c bank"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]