Re: [PATCH 6/9] media: sun6i-csi: capture: Implement MC I/O with extended enum_fmt

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Paul,

Thank you for the patch.

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 04:12:25PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> This driver needs the media-controller API to operate and should not be
> considered as a video-device-centric implementation.
> 
> Properly report the IO_MC device cap and extend the enum_fmt
> implementation to support enumeration with an explicit mbus_code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi_capture.c       | 36 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi_capture.c
> index 6ce7f1d3ed57..9627030ff060 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi_capture.c
> @@ -777,13 +777,40 @@ static int sun6i_csi_capture_enum_fmt(struct file *file, void *private,
>  				      struct v4l2_fmtdesc *fmtdesc)
>  {
>  	u32 index = fmtdesc->index;
> +	u32 mbus_code = fmtdesc->mbus_code;
> +	unsigned int index_valid = 0;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (!mbus_code) {
> +		if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE(sun6i_csi_capture_formats))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		fmtdesc->pixelformat =
> +			sun6i_csi_capture_formats[index].pixelformat;
> +
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Check capture pixel format matching with mbus code. */
>  
> -	if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE(sun6i_csi_capture_formats))
> +	if (!sun6i_csi_bridge_format_find(mbus_code))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	fmtdesc->pixelformat = sun6i_csi_capture_formats[index].pixelformat;
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sun6i_csi_capture_formats); i++) {
> +		u32 pixelformat = sun6i_csi_capture_formats[i].pixelformat;
>  
> -	return 0;
> +		if (!sun6i_csi_capture_format_check(pixelformat, mbus_code))
> +			continue;

I would probably have added compatible media bus codes to the
sun6i_csi_capture_format structure. This should work though, even if it
is more CPU-intensive. I'm OK with either option.

> +
> +		if (index == index_valid) {

You can replace this with

		if (index == 0) {

and

		index_valid++;

with

		index--;

below, and drop the index_valid variable.

> +			fmtdesc->pixelformat = pixelformat;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +
> +		index_valid++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
>  static int sun6i_csi_capture_g_fmt(struct file *file, void *private,
> @@ -1039,7 +1066,8 @@ int sun6i_csi_capture_setup(struct sun6i_csi_device *csi_dev)
>  
>  	strscpy(video_dev->name, SUN6I_CSI_CAPTURE_NAME,
>  		sizeof(video_dev->name));
> -	video_dev->device_caps = V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE | V4L2_CAP_STREAMING;
> +	video_dev->device_caps = V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE | V4L2_CAP_STREAMING |
> +				 V4L2_CAP_IO_MC;
>  	video_dev->vfl_dir = VFL_DIR_RX;
>  	video_dev->release = video_device_release_empty;

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart