Re: Unfair qspinlocks on ARM64 without LSE atomics => 3ms delay in interrupt handling

[Bouska, Zdenek]

>> So I confirmed that atomic operations from
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h can be quite slow when they are
>> contested from second CPU.
>> 
>> Do you think that it is possible to create fair qspinlock implementation
>> on top of atomic instructions supported by ARM64 version 8 (no LSE atomic
>> instructions) without compromising performance in the uncontested case?
>> For example ARM64 could have custom queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire
>> implementation same as x86 has in arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h. Is the
>> retry loop in irq_finalize_oneshot() ok together with the current ARM64
>> cpu_relax() implementation for processor with no LSE atomic instructions?
>
>So is the queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire() where it gets stuck or the
>earlier atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire() before entering on the slow path? I
>guess both can fail in a similar way.

For me it was stuck on queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire().

Zdenek Bouska

--
Siemens, s.r.o
Siemens Advanta Development