Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 0/5] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

On 26.03.2023 18:07:14, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > On 21.03.2023 12:25:15, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > > A gentle ping to remind you of this series.
> > > I have no idea why it hasn't deserved any response for quite some
> > > time.
> > > Is there anything I am still missing?
> >
> > I wonder if we want to do a s/master/primary/ in the DT bindings and
> > driver?
> 
> The ST reference manual (RM0386) explicitly uses the master and slave words
> in the bxcan chapter.

ACK

> I would stay consistent with it.

Yes, this is a known problem, on the one hand I'd like the drivers to
match the datasheet, but here I am in favor of a deviation.

> But I have no problem changing it to primary. I just sent v8 with the
> changes you suggested for shared irq and clock enable/disable,

These changes look good!

> but if you prefer to use primary I will send the v9 version with that
> change. Please let me know your opinion.

Please convert the driver and bindings to use "primary". Feel free to
mention that the datasheet calls the primary peripheral "master".

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129  |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature