Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: core: run atomic i2c xfer when !preemptible

[Benjamin Bara]

On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 at 16:54, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For the !CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT case, preemptible() is defined 0. So,
> don't we lose the irqs_disabled() check in that case?

Thanks for the feedback!
PREEMPT_COUNT is selected by PREEMPTION, so I guess in the case of
!PREEMPT_COUNT,
we should be atomic (anyways)?