Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] perf: Allow a PMU to have a parent.

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Wed Mar 29 2023 - 04:56:03 EST


On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:01:08 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:54:44AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 13:04:08 -0400
> > "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2023-03-24 1:13 p.m., Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > > Some PMUs have well defined parents such as PCI devices.
> > > > As the device_initialize() and device_add() are all within
> > > > pmu_dev_alloc() which is called from perf_pmu_register()
> > > > there is no opportunity to set the parent from within a driver.
> > > >
> > > > Add a struct device *parent field to struct pmu and use that
> > > > to set the parent.
> > >
> > > Why we want a PMU parent? Maybe I missed it. I don't see that the parent
> > > is used anywhere.
> >
> > This allows you to identify the association between PMU and the hardware related
> > device that is providing it by looking at the directory structure in sysfs rather
> > than putting them directly under /sys/devices.
> >
> > ls -l /sys/bus/event_sources/devices/
> >
> > ... armv8_pmuv3_0 -> ../../../devices/arm8_pmuv3_0
> > ... breakpoint -> ../../../devices/breakpoint
> > ... cpmu0 -> ../../../devices/pci0000:0c/0000:0c:00.0/0000:0d:00.0/cpmu0/cpmu0
> > etc
> >
> > (the first cpmu0 is the parent registered as a child of the PCI EP and used for
> > driver binding). So it's of use to userspace rather than in the kernel driver
> > itself.
> >
> > Note that almost nothing is normally in the top level /sys/devices other than
> > event_sources - because nearly all other struct device instances created by
> > subsystems have parents assigned.
> >
> > On my system
> >
> > ls /sys/devices
> >
> > armv8_pmuv3_0 LNXSYSTEM:00 pci0000:0c pnp0 system uprobe
> > breakpoint pci0000:00 platform software tracepoint virtual
> >
> > +CC Greg KH for input on whether / why this make sense.
>
> That doesn't make sense, nothing should be in /sys/devices/ EXCEPT the
> root device of busses. Everything else is wrong and should have their
> code fixed up (i.e. "breakpoint", "software", etc.)

Thanks Greg.

I was thinking to cycle back round to that once I'd got agreement on 'some' devices,
but great to have clarity from the start that these should all have
parents.

For a few cases the parent is not immediately obvious but we'll figure it out.

Jonathan


>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h