Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions

From: Eric Biggers
Date: Wed Mar 29 2023 - 14:44:10 EST

Next message: Yosry Ahmed: "Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] memcg: replace stats_flush_lock with an atomic"
Previous message: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: CPPC: use 10ms delay instead of 2us to avoid high error"
In reply to: Heiko Stuebner: "[PATCH v4 2/4] RISC-V: add Zbkb extension detection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Heiko,

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>
> [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions

Has there been consideration of implementing AES-GCM instead of GHASH by itself?
This is what arm64 does, for example. There is not currently any use case for
GHASH outside of AES-GCM, and it's more efficient to implement the full AES-GCM.

- Eric

Next message: Yosry Ahmed: "Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] memcg: replace stats_flush_lock with an atomic"
Previous message: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: CPPC: use 10ms delay instead of 2us to avoid high error"
In reply to: Heiko Stuebner: "[PATCH v4 2/4] RISC-V: add Zbkb extension detection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]