[RFC PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: core: Consistently set mutex_owner when using ww_mutex_lock_slow()

[Douglas Anderson]

When a codepath locks a rdev using ww_mutex_lock_slow() directly then
that codepath is responsible for incrementing the "ref_cnt" and also
setting the "mutex_owner" to "current".

The regulator core consistently got that right for "ref_cnt" but
didn't always get it right for "mutex_owner". Let's fix this.

It's unlikely that this truly matters because the "mutex_owner" is
only needed if we're going to do subsequent locking of the same
rdev. However, even though it's not truly needed it seems less
surprising if we consistently set "mutex_owner" properly.

Fixes: f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v2:
- "Consistently set mutex_owner when using ww_mutex_lock_slow()" new for v2.

 drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 1490eb40c973..9a13240f3084 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static void regulator_lock_dependent(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			ww_mutex_lock_slow(&new_contended_rdev->mutex, ww_ctx);
 			old_contended_rdev = new_contended_rdev;
 			old_contended_rdev->ref_cnt++;
+			old_contended_rdev->mutex_owner = current;
 		}
 
 		err = regulator_lock_recursive(rdev,
@@ -6048,6 +6049,7 @@ static void regulator_summary_lock(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
 			ww_mutex_lock_slow(&new_contended_rdev->mutex, ww_ctx);
 			old_contended_rdev = new_contended_rdev;
 			old_contended_rdev->ref_cnt++;
+			old_contended_rdev->mutex_owner = current;
 		}
 
 		err = regulator_summary_lock_all(ww_ctx,
-- 
2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog