Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit

From: Mathias Krause
Date: Thu Mar 30 2023 - 04:45:52 EST

Next message: Cristian Marussi: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox : arm,mhuv2: Allow for more RX interrupts"
Previous message: Maulik Shah: "[PATCH v2 1/2] cpuidle: psci: Move enabling OSI mode after power domains creation"
In reply to: Xiaoyao Li: "Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit"
Next in thread: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 22.03.23 02:37, Mathias Krause wrote:
> Guests like grsecurity that make heavy use of CR0.WP to implement kernel
> level W^X will suffer from the implied VMEXITs.
>
> With EPT there is no need to intercept a guest change of CR0.WP, so
> simply make it a guest owned bit if we can do so.
>
> This implies that a read of a guest's CR0.WP bit might need a VMREAD.
> However, the only potentially affected user seems to be kvm_init_mmu()
> which is a heavy operation to begin with. But also most callers already
> cache the full value of CR0 anyway, so no additional VMREAD is needed.
> The only exception is nested_vmx_load_cr3().
>
> This change is VMX-specific, as SVM has no such fine grained control
> register intercept control.

Just a heads up! We did more tests, especially with the backports we did
internally already, and ran into a bug when running a nested guest on an
ESXi host.

Setup is like: ESXi (L0) -> Linux (L1) -> Linux (L2)

The Linux system, especially the kernel, is the same for L1 and L2. It's
a grsecurity kernel, so makes use of toggling CR0.WP at runtime.

The bug we see is that when L2 disables CR0.WP and tries to write to an
r/o memory region (implicitly to the r/o GDT via LTR in our use case),
this triggers a fault (EPT violation?) that gets ignored by L1, as,
apparently, everything is fine from its point of view.

I suspect the L0 VMM to be at fault here, as the VMCS structures look
good, IMO. Here is a dump of vmx->loaded_vmcs in handle_triple_fault():

[…] VMX: TRIPLE FAULT!
[…] VMCS ffff8883a9f18000, last attempted VM-entry on CPU 8
[…] *** Guest State ***
[…] CR0: actual=0x0000000080040033, shadow=0x0000000080050033,
gh_mask=fffffffffffefff7

CR0 in the L2 VM has CR0.WP disabled. However, it is set in the shadow
CR0 but masked out via CR0_MASK, so should be read as the guest's value,
according to the SDM.

I also tried masking the shadow CR0 value in vmx_set_cr0(), but that
makes no difference.

[…] CR4: actual=0x00000000003220f0, shadow=0x00000000003208b0,
gh_mask=fffffffffffff871
[…] CR3 = 0x0000000002684000
[…] PDPTR0 = 0x0000000007d39001 PDPTR1 = 0x00000000033b5001
[…] PDPTR2 = 0x000000000238c001 PDPTR3 = 0x0000000001c54001
[…] RSP = 0xfffffe8040087f50 RIP = 0xffffffff8105d435
[…] RFLAGS=0x00010006 DR7 = 0x0000000000000400
[…] Sysenter RSP=0000000000000000 CS:RIP=0000:0000000000000000
[…] CS: sel=0x0010, attr=0x0a09b, limit=0xffffffff,
base=0x0000000000000000
[…] DS: sel=0x0000, attr=0x1c001, limit=0xffffffff,
base=0x0000000000000000
[…] SS: sel=0x0000, attr=0x1c001, limit=0xffffffff,
base=0x0000000000000000
[…] ES: sel=0x0000, attr=0x1c001, limit=0xffffffff,
base=0x0000000000000000
[…] FS: sel=0x0000, attr=0x1c001, limit=0xffffffff,
base=0x0000000000000000
[…] GS: sel=0x0000, attr=0x1c001, limit=0xffffffff,
base=0xffff888232e00000
[…] GDTR: limit=0x00000097,
base=0xfffffe0000201000
[…] LDTR: sel=0x0000, attr=0x00082, limit=0x0000ffff,
base=0x0000000000000000
[…] IDTR: limit=0x000001ff,
base=0xffffffff84004000
[…] TR: sel=0x0000, attr=0x0008b, limit=0x0000ffff,
base=0x0000000000000000
[…] EFER= 0x0000000000000d01 (effective)
[…] PAT = 0x0007040600070406
[…] DebugCtl = 0x0000000000000000 DebugExceptions = 0x0000000000000000
[…] Interruptibility = 00000000 ActivityState = 00000000
[…] *** Host State ***
[…] RIP = 0xffffffff86d28db6 RSP = 0xfffffe8040927d50
[…] CS=0010 SS=0018 DS=0000 ES=0000 FS=0000 GS=0000 TR=0040
[…] FSBase=0000639563fce700 GSBase=ffff88881a800000 TRBase=fffffe0001003000
[…] GDTBase=fffffe0001001000 IDTBase=fffffe0000000000
[…] CR0=0000000080050033 CR3=00000000026a0004 CR4=00000000007626f0

The "host" (which is our L1 VMM, I guess) has CR0.WP enabled and that is
what I think confuses ESXi to enforce the read-only property to the L2
guest as well -- for unknown reasons so far.

[…] Sysenter RSP=fffffe0001003000 CS:RIP=0010:ffffffff810031a0
[…] PAT = 0x0407050600070106
[…] *** Control State ***
[…] PinBased=0000003f CPUBased=b5a06dfa SecondaryExec=001034ee
[…] EntryControls=000053ff ExitControls=000befff
[…] ExceptionBitmap=00060042 PFECmask=00000000 PFECmatch=00000000
[…] VMEntry: intr_info=00000000 errcode=00000003 ilen=00000000
[…] VMExit: intr_info=00000000 errcode=00000000 ilen=00000000
[…] reason=00000002 qualification=0000000000000000
[…] IDTVectoring: info=00000000 errcode=00000000
[…] TSC Offset = 0xffffad7a1057f4cc
[…] TPR Threshold = 0x00
[…] virt-APIC addr = 0x000000015716b000
[…] EPT pointer = 0x0000000583c1e05e
[…] PLE Gap=00000080 Window=00001000
[…] Virtual processor ID = 0x0002

I tried to reproduce the bug with different KVM based L0 VMMs (with and
without this series; vanilla and grsecurity kernels) but no luck. That's
why I'm suspecting a ESXi bug.

I'm leaning to make CR0.WP guest owned only iff we're running on bare
metal or the VMM is KVM to not play whack-a-mole for all the VMMs that
might have similar bugs. (Will try to test a few others here as well.)
However, that would prevent them from getting the performance gain, so
I'd rather have this fixed / worked around in KVM instead.

Any ideas how to investigate this further?

Thanks,
Mathias

PS: ...should have left the chicken bit of v3 to be able to disable the
feature by a module parameter ;)

>
> Suggested-and-co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h
> index 4c91f626c058..e50d353b5c1c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>
> -#define KVM_POSSIBLE_CR0_GUEST_BITS X86_CR0_TS
> +#define KVM_POSSIBLE_CR0_GUEST_BITS (X86_CR0_TS | X86_CR0_WP)
> #define KVM_POSSIBLE_CR4_GUEST_BITS \
> (X86_CR4_PVI | X86_CR4_DE | X86_CR4_PCE | X86_CR4_OSFXSR \
> | X86_CR4_OSXMMEXCPT | X86_CR4_PGE | X86_CR4_TSD | X86_CR4_FSGSBASE)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index f63b28f46a71..61d940fc91ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -4481,7 +4481,7 @@ static void load_vmcs12_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK is already set in the original vmcs01
> * (KVM doesn't change it);
> */
> - vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits = KVM_POSSIBLE_CR0_GUEST_BITS;
> + vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits = vmx_l1_guest_owned_cr0_bits();
> vmx_set_cr0(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr0);
>
> /* Same as above - no reason to call set_cr4_guest_host_mask(). */
> @@ -4632,7 +4632,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_restore_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> vmx_set_efer(vcpu, nested_vmx_get_vmcs01_guest_efer(vmx));
>
> - vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits = KVM_POSSIBLE_CR0_GUEST_BITS;
> + vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits = vmx_l1_guest_owned_cr0_bits();
> vmx_set_cr0(vcpu, vmcs_readl(CR0_READ_SHADOW));
>
> vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_owned_bits = ~vmcs_readl(CR4_GUEST_HOST_MASK);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 8fc1a0c7856f..e501f6864a72 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -4790,7 +4790,7 @@ static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> /* 22.2.1, 20.8.1 */
> vm_entry_controls_set(vmx, vmx_vmentry_ctrl());
>
> - vmx->vcpu.arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits = KVM_POSSIBLE_CR0_GUEST_BITS;
> + vmx->vcpu.arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits = vmx_l1_guest_owned_cr0_bits();
> vmcs_writel(CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK, ~vmx->vcpu.arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits);
>
> set_cr4_guest_host_mask(vmx);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index 2acdc54bc34b..423e9d3c9c40 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -640,6 +640,24 @@ BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(tertiary_exec, TERTIARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 64)
> (1 << VCPU_EXREG_EXIT_INFO_1) | \
> (1 << VCPU_EXREG_EXIT_INFO_2))
>
> +static inline unsigned long vmx_l1_guest_owned_cr0_bits(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long bits = KVM_POSSIBLE_CR0_GUEST_BITS;
> +
> + /*
> + * CR0.WP needs to be intercepted when KVM is shadowing legacy paging
> + * in order to construct shadow PTEs with the correct protections.
> + * Note! CR0.WP technically can be passed through to the guest if
> + * paging is disabled, but checking CR0.PG would generate a cyclical
> + * dependency of sorts due to forcing the caller to ensure CR0 holds
> + * the correct value prior to determining which CR0 bits can be owned
> + * by L1. Keep it simple and limit the optimization to EPT.
> + */
> + if (!enable_ept)
> + bits &= ~X86_CR0_WP;
> + return bits;
> +}
> +
> static __always_inline struct kvm_vmx *to_kvm_vmx(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> return container_of(kvm, struct kvm_vmx, kvm);

Next message: Cristian Marussi: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox : arm,mhuv2: Allow for more RX interrupts"
Previous message: Maulik Shah: "[PATCH v2 1/2] cpuidle: psci: Move enabling OSI mode after power domains creation"
In reply to: Xiaoyao Li: "Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit"
Next in thread: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]