Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] function_graph: Support recording and printing the return value of function

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:59:48 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Please control your spamming:
> 
> From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> 
> Don't get discouraged - or impatient
> ------------------------------------
> 
> After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait.  Reviewers are
> busy people and may not get to your patch right away.
> 
> Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment,
> but the development process works more smoothly than that now.  You should
> receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure
> that you have sent your patches to the right place.  Wait for a minimum of
> 						     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> busy times like merge windows.

To be fair, this isn't a ping or a resend. It's addressing comments that
were given in v8 that was sent out on Tuesday.

This isn't v1, where I would agree with waiting a week for comments. v1 was
sent back in 3/6. I do not expect (nor want) someone to wait a week on v8
for all feedback to come in, unless it was a redesign of the code. But it's
now starting to settle, and that "week waiting" period isn't necessary for
fixing up minor suggestions by the reviewers.

I was hoping this would be good to go by the end of the week, so I could
get it into linux-next by next week.

-- Steve